Day 1 — Part 1
Day 1 · September 8, 2026 · 3:59:16
Key points This session opens the four-day Allison Inquiry, an independent, non-partisan hearing in Ottawa established to listen to Canadians who report serious injuries following COVID-19 vaccination. Member of Parliament Dean Allison chairs the inquiry, which is run with the Covid Testimony Association and states it has received over 1,400 applications from injured Canadians. In opening statements, Chair Allison and Inquiry Counsel Shawn Buckley describe the inquiry's purpose and say witnesses and doctors have been pressured, silenced, or dismissed when raising vaccine-injury concerns. The main witness is US Senator Ron Johnson, sworn in under oath, introduced as a longtime chair of Senate committees who has investigated the COVID-19 response for years. Johnson testifies at length, arguing the pandemic response was a failure and criticizing lockdowns, mandates, and what he calls the suppression of early treatments like ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine. He raises claims about VAERS-reported deaths, alleged downplaying of myocarditis signals, Fauci's diary, and reported cases of what one doctor labeled turbo cancer linked to mRNA technology. Members of Parliament, including MP Lewis and MP Jivani, question Johnson on cancer, vaccine-injury compensation programs, and political barriers before the session adjourns for a break.
Speaker 1
1:58 To everyone watching this online from across Canada and around the world, thank you for tuning in. 2:07 Most importantly, I want to acknowledge the more than 1,400 vaccine-injured Canadians who have applied to appear as a witness before this inquiry and many others who continue to come forward. 2:18 To each of you, thank you for trusting us with your story. 2:22 We know we cannot hear from everyone during these four days, 2:25 but that does not mean your experience is any less important. 2:28 We still want to hear your story, and we will continue collecting and documenting these experiences. 2:34 Over the next four days, our primary focus will be listening to Canadians who reported serious injuries following COVID-19 vaccination. 2:43 We'll hear what happened to them, how their lives and families have been affected, and what happened when they sought medical care, answers, recognition, and compensation. 2:54 And the federal government's own numbers provide important context. 2:59 Health Canada and the Public Health Agency of Canada's COVID-19 vaccine safety report recorded over 59,000 adverse event reports following COVID-19 vaccination, including over 11,000 reports classified as serious. 3:16 But even those numbers... 3:18 may not tell us the whole story because one of the questions we need to examine is how difficult it was for some doctors and patients to have suspected vaccine injuries formally reported and recognized. 3:32 At our August 13th press conference, Dr. Charles Hoff, a family physician who served patients in and around Lytton, British Columbia for decades, described his own experience. 3:44 Dr. Hoff? 3:46 told us that after caring for many of these patients for 28 years, he began seeing serious medical problems following vaccination that he believed that needed to be reported. 3:56 He said that ultimately, he submitted over 14 vaccine injury reports to provincial public health authorities. 4:05 And according to Dr. Hoff, every one of those 14 reports were rejected or dismissed as coincidence. 4:12 A physician who had known many of his patients for nearly three decades, believed he was seeing serious safety signals, attempted to report them to the system, and he says he repeatedly encountered barriers to having those cases recognized. 4:30 That raises an important question for this inquiry. 4:33 If doctors had difficulty reporting suspected injuries, how many Canadians may never have made it into the official statistics at all? 4:43 Then there's the question of compensation. 4:46 The Federal Vaccine Injury Support Program received 3,500 claims under its former administration. 4:53 Of those, just over 3,000 were deemed admissible, yet only 252 claims had been approved by the Medical Review Board, with an additional 11 appeals approved. 5:04 The federal government reports approximately $21.5 million in financial support was paid to claimants. 5:11 And I want to acknowledge the journalists who helped bring greater scrutiny to this program. 5:17 I want to thank Tamara Ugolini from Rebel News. 5:19 She's in the room today, as is Dr. Hoff, for their relentless pursuit of answers, including through access to information requests and digging through documents and documentations and numbers surrounding the Vaccine Injury Support Program. 5:33 Their reporting helped bring information into the public domain that Canadians might otherwise have never seen, and it underscored why transparency and accountability matter. 5:44 I also want to thank Global News for pursuing the same story last fall and bringing a wider public attention to the difficulties surrounding the program and its questions of accountability. 5:55 A free press has an important role to play in asking questions, obtaining information, and putting facts before Canadians, particularly when institutions themselves have not provided the transparency behind that people deserve. 6:09 Those numbers raise important questions, but behind every number is a person, a family, and a story. 6:17 That is why we are here. 6:18 The purpose of this inquiry is to hear those stories and to examine the experiences of Canadians seeking medical care, recognition and compensation. 6:27 But before we do that, I believe we need to understand the broader context of how we got to this place. 6:33 More than 30 countries have undertaken some form of review or inquiry in their pandemic response. 6:39 Yet Canada has still not concluded this kind of comprehensive national public inquiry that many Canadians have been asking for. 6:46 South of the border, one of the people who has spent years asking difficult questions and examining the evidence is United States Senator Ron Johnson. 6:55 Over the past five years, Senator Johnson has convened dozens of meetings, hearings, and roundtables examining different aspects of the pandemic response and has heard testimony from doctors, scientists, researchers, and other experts. 7:10 I have asked Senator Johnson to begin her inquiry by giving us an overview of what he has heard and what he has learned through that work. 7:18 I believe that context is important for the vaccine-injured Canadians we will hear from this week. 7:24 Ultimately, this question is about people hearing from those who are injured, understanding the challenges they have faced, assessing care and compensation, and ensuring their experiences are documented and heard. 7:38 But before we examine where we are today, we need to have a better understanding of how we got here. 7:44 Senator Johnson, thank you very much for taking time out of your very busy schedule. 7:50 I understand these things. 7:52 I know in your role, you're that much busier. 7:54 To join us and to share what you've learned over these past five years. Speaker 2
8:03 My name is Shawn Buckley and I'm Inquiry Counsel. 8:06 And I would like to thank everyone who is watching. 8:09 I would like to thank all of those volunteers that have tirelessly worked to have this happen. 8:17 And I'd like to thank the vaccine injured that are traveling, often at great cost to be here and the experts who have donated their time. 8:28 When this Allison inquiry began, we set out with the single purpose of listening to vaccine injured Canadians. 8:39 And we knew that these people were the nations. 8:42 These were Canada's dirty little secret, the vaccine injured. 8:49 Doctors are forbidden to speak about them. 8:53 A doctor in Canada today cannot openly be questioning the COVID-19 vaccines and not face discipline by their professional college. 9:06 MPs are forbidden to publicly speak about the vaccine injured. 9:13 Before this inquiry, we met with MP after MP after MP and this 9:18 This would be about six months ago. 9:21 And at the time, we were just asking, would it be possible for you to sit at a table and publicly listen to vaccine-injured Canadians speak about their injuries? 9:34 And the answer unanimously was, no, this is not politically possible. 9:40 It speaks volumes that the support for this inquiry and the bravery of the MPs that are at the table 9:47 currently right now, and we thank them for being here, and the MPs that will be sitting as this week goes by. 9:54 But they are not allowed to speak. 9:57 We're hoping that this inquiry will allow all groups to speak. 10:02 I will say that it seems that CBC journalists... 10:09 But let's extend that to the wider mainstream media. 10:13 because it's the mainstream media that sets the pace and sets the message for much of this nation. 10:20 But we learned something else which is deeply troubling. 10:24 We learned that families in Canada are forbidden to be speaking about vaccine injury. 10:32 I'd like to speak about two people that we selected. 10:35 As MP Dean Allison, the chair of this inquiry, has correctly stated, we've had over 1,400 applications. 10:43 And most of the nation doesn't know we exist. 10:47 So the fact that we've had 1,400 applications from people willing to testify in itself speaks that the number of people that are vaccine injured is dramatically higher than any of us have estimated. 11:02 But they get sorted and they go through this funneling process. 11:04 And by the time they get to me to interview, they're largely vetted. 11:10 And there were some that we interviewed and they were excited about coming. 11:13 They committed to coming. 11:14 We slotted them in. 11:18 And then they backed out because of family pressure. 11:21 So one of them told me, you know, my daughter-in-law made it clear that if I testify, I will never see my grandchildren again. 11:30 Think about that. 11:32 This is September 8th, 2026 in Canada. 11:37 And a family will be torn apart and destroyed if somebody who is vaccine injured publicly. 11:47 If I testify at the Allison Inquiry and share my story, truthful vaccine injuries. 11:54 Another thing that occurred in our preparation is I'm interviewing the potential witnesses. 12:03 And many of them, as you'll see, they're in wheelchairs. 12:07 One of them couldn't testify when we wanted them to because they had to schedule dialysis for while they're in Ottawa. 12:15 And so we had to move them in the schedule. 12:19 A different one, not only is he in a wheelchair, but his bowels don't move. 12:24 So he's got two IV bags, one going, because the only way he can eat is IV straight into his veins and then a very slow drip into the stomach. 12:36 Actually, we had to get an extension cord so that the batteries on his pumps are functioning when he testifies in this room later this week. 12:46 I'm expecting, I asked these people the question, you know, at the end of the interview, what's been the hardest part of this journey? 12:54 And I'm expecting, I lost my kidneys, I'm waiting for a transplant, I'm in a wheelchair, I'm in chronic pain. 13:00 And almost invariably, that's not the answer. 13:05 Almost every time these witnesses have said the worst part is not being heard. 13:11 I'm injured. 13:14 Did we go offline? 13:16 Okay, so we'll stop and start again. 13:19 Sorry, everyone, we've gone offline. Speaker 3
13:25 That's interesting. 13:28 When did it first drop? 13:32 Okay. Speaker 2
14:29 So for those of you watching online, we're having some technical difficulties, which is very curious for a committee room, Committee Room 415 on Parliament Hill in the Wellington Building. 14:46 I would expect that when normal committees are sitting in this room that they have flawless internet and that things run absolutely perfectly. 14:55 So you're just going to have to bear with us because the reality is that we're having internet problems even though we're trying with various things. 15:05 Can I ask David, our AV person, any idea at what point when I was speaking that we got cut off? 15:15 Okay. 15:17 So trusting that you, you've heard what I said earlier. 15:20 And again, this is just part of the journey and part of the experience and part of the story. 15:26 This is a live inquiry being broadcast live and we appreciate you all being here. 15:31 So I was sharing about how, when I asked these people, what's the worst part that they're sharing that it's not their injuries, it's not their suffering. 15:43 It's not being heard. 15:47 You know, we have one witness that we have a video of him walking or trying to walk. 15:52 It's awful. 15:54 And the neurologist is telling him at that time to go and see a psychiatrist. 15:59 And with it, Daisy's hospitalized for six months and is in a wheelchair. 16:02 And this is the gentleman that has two feeding tubes. 16:05 So and that's just an example. 16:07 Witness after witness explains that they and they use the word gaslit, that they're literally gaslit. 16:14 Can you imagine being seriously injured? 16:17 And when you go to engage medical attention every single time that you're going to expect to actually be ridiculed, made fun of, to be treated with absolute derision, so that accessing medical care becomes a traumatic experience. 16:37 I've had several of the witnesses share with me that actually they would rather die than engage the hospital system. 16:44 And this is Canada. 16:47 in September of 2026. 16:51 Now the witnesses that are attending here, the vaccine injured witnesses are attending voluntarily. 16:57 This committee does not have subpoena power. 16:59 We're not compelling any of them to attend. 17:02 But I think that it's more fair to say that even though we're not compelling them to be here, that they're not coming voluntarily. 17:11 They feel obligated to take this single opportunity 17:17 to share their stories. 17:18 Many of them are travelling at great personal cost. 17:21 Some of those that you watch testify, they're going to be brave. 17:24 They're going to sit straight. 17:26 They're going to answer our questions and share with us their journeys. 17:30 But they're going to be in bed for weeks or months. 17:35 They're going to suffer terribly for both the journey, they're coming from across Canada, and for sitting in the chair. 17:42 And the experts are also all volunteering their time. 17:48 which is a huge commitment and we need to honour them. 17:52 Now many who are watching this and we we pray that the entire nation will be watching this but many that are watching this do not believe that the COVID-19 vaccines caused much harm at all let alone you know significant harm and they have a concern 18:13 about vaccine hesitancy and they have a concern that these proceedings will cause vaccine hesitancy and you know I say to you that listening is the first step to regaining trust because the reality is a significant portion of this nation no longer trusts in our health care system in public health and if you have concern about vaccine hesitancy if you 18:42 If you don't believe that these vaccines caused harm, that's okay. 18:46 And you can continue, you know, with whatever belief system you want, but understand listening to these people. 18:55 Don't change your mind, but listen to them. 18:58 I didn't mean that, don't change your mind, but you don't have to, that's up to you, that's voluntary. 19:03 But listen to them because that's the first step to regaining trust. 19:07 And listening with an open mind, just listen. 19:12 to listen to their stories. 19:15 It's the first step to regaining trust. 19:17 It's the first step for us taking a step forward and treating them properly. 19:22 And I'm going to make everyone watching this a promise that if you watch all four days of the Allison Inquiry, you will never be the same. 19:31 It literally will be as if you've walked through a door and the door's closed behind you and then you realize the door's locked and you can't go back. 19:40 your perception will have changed. 19:43 We are about to be honoured here. 19:46 In the next four days, we are going to hear from vaccine-injured Canadians who have travelled at great cost to share their story with us. 19:55 They've travelled to share something precious with us, and they've travelled literally to free us. 20:03 They're travelling for us. 20:05 And so I'd like to just say God bless them. 20:09 Now, I'd like to call our first witness who's already been announced, U.S. 20:13 Senator Ron Johnson. 20:16 Senator Johnson, will you take the Bible in your right hand, please? 20:23 Senator Johnson, do you swear to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, so help you God? 20:32 Now, I'm going to introduce Senator Johnson before he's questioned. 20:37 But I would like to say that it may be that history is being made today. 20:42 It may be that never before in Canadian history has a U.S. 20:46 Senator testified in any committee room in Ottawa, let alone under oath. 20:54 And Senator Johnson, we thank you for coming. 20:56 I'm going to spend a bit of time outlining some of what Senator Johnson has done, some of his responsibilities. 21:06 And it's just so that those watching who don't know Senator Johnson come to understand that the amount of time that has been spent looking into COVID issues in an official and unofficial capacity. 21:21 So Senator Johnson, I'm going to go through things. 21:24 If I get anything wrong, just correct me afterwards. 21:27 But Senator Johnson is an elected U.S. 21:30 Senator and has been so for 16 years. 21:33 From 2015 to 2021, he was the chairman of the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, and he remains an active member of that committee to this day. 21:51 The Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs is the Senate's primary oversight committee with broad jurisdiction over government operations generally, 22:03 and the Department of Homeland Security. 22:06 The Committee of Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs has almost unlimited jurisdiction regarding oversight of the United States federal government. 22:16 Senator Johnson is currently the chairman of the U.S. Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations. 22:24 The Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations is the committee's chief investigative subcommittee, so of this, 22:32 Senate Committee on Homeland Security. 22:34 And it has the responsibility of studying and investigating the efficiency and economy of operations relating to all branches of government. 22:44 This subcommittee, the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations is also tasked with studying and investigating the compliance or non-compliance with rules, regulations and law, investigating all aspects of crime and lawlessness within the United States 23:02 which have an impact upon or affect the national health, welfare and safety, including syndicated crime, investment fraud schemes, commodity and security fraud, computer fraud and the use of offshore banking and corporate facilities to carry out criminal objectives. 23:23 Now, together, 23:25 the Committee of Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs and the U.S. Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations are arguably two of the most powerful government committees in the world. 23:41 Senator Johnson has unique expertise into COVID-19 and the COVID-19 vaccines. 23:53 The government response in the United States to COVID-19 was within the Committee of Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs jurisdiction and responsibility. 24:04 When this pandemic broke out, Senator Johnson was the chairperson of this committee that had the responsibility, the legal responsibility placed upon them by the electorate to investigate how the government was handling COVID-19 vaccines. 24:20 As chairman, 24:22 of that committee. 24:23 And I'm not, I'm only going to go through things that jumped out at me to highlight to you the experience that Senator Johnson has. 24:32 But starting on February 12th, 2020, he chaired a committee investigation into, are we prepared protecting the U.S. from global pandemics? 24:44 On March 5th, 2020, 24:46 He chaired the federal interagency response to the coronavirus and preparing for future global pandemics. 24:53 On May 6, 2020, an inquiry into COVID-19, how new information should drive policy. 24:59 In June 9, 2020, evaluating the federal government's procurement and distribution strategies in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. 25:07 June 24, 2020, the role of the strategic national stockpile in pandemic response. 25:14 In November 19, 2020, early outpatient treatment, an essential part of the COVID-19 solution. 25:21 December 8, 2020, carrying on that same investigation. 25:25 He has organized events outside of his role as committee in July 15, 2021. 25:32 The first time in the world, he chaired an event where vaccine injured persons, persons injured by the COVID-19 vaccine, were able to share their stories. 25:42 November 2nd, 2021, he chaired an expert panel on federal vaccine mandates. 25:48 He had expert speaks on several issues concerning the vaccine mandates. 25:52 On December 8th, 2021, he did an address to the US Senate concerning COVID and the vaccines. 26:02 I'm going to skip ahead here, but I think I'm making the point that Senator Johnson has for years now, for six years, been involved 26:12 specifically in conducting investigations. 26:17 More recently, as chairman of the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations on May 21st, 2025, he chaired an investigation titled The Corruption of Science and Federal Health Agencies, How Health Officials Downplayed and Hid Myocarditis and Other Adverse Events Associated with COVID-19 Vaccines. 26:41 On July 15th, 2025, that committee inquired on issues of vaccine injury. 26:48 On September 9th, 2025, an inquiry, and it's titled, How the Corruption of Science Has Impacted Public Perception and Policy Regarding Vaccines. 26:59 I noted when I was preparing that Toby Rogers, Ph.D., 27:04 spoke about how early CDC data showed that the COVID-19 vaccines actually had negative efficacy after six months, meaning that you are more likely to get COVID. 27:16 April 29, 2026, an inquiry into how Biden health officials purposely turned a blind eye towards COVID-19 vaccine safety signals. 27:28 If anyone wants, that is going to be an exhibit, an appendix, 27:33 Four of that lists a number of activities that Senator Johnson has been involved with and that I'm not going to mention. 27:41 And finally, on June 3rd, 2026, an inquiry plausible mechanisms of COVID-19 injections causing cancer and attacks on scientific publications and research. 27:56 Senator Johnson in investigating COVID-19 issues and COVID-19 vaccine issues 28:03 has access to information that the rest of us do not have. 28:08 And as I go through this, I hope that everyone can absolutely appreciate that you prepare for each of these hearings. 28:16 You speak to experts. 28:17 It's like, you know, court, you know, there's five hours for every hour in court, at least. 28:22 So I'm introducing you, Senator Johnson, as the person, the government official that has investigated COVID-19, 28:31 government response to COVID-19, COVID-19 vaccines, injuries caused by COVID-19 vaccines, more than any other government official, elected or unelected in the world. 28:44 And you have investigated this as chairperson of committees that have a duty and responsibility to look into this. 28:50 And on behalf of the Allison Inquiry, we welcome you. 28:55 Perhaps we should start just with me asking the question to 28:58 If you can tell us something about yourself, I know I've gone on for a long time here, and how this journey started for you. Speaker 5
29:06 Before I answer that, let me just, first of all, thank you for your kind introduction. 29:10 I want to make a couple of quick points. 29:14 I genuinely and sincerely love Canada and Canadians. 29:20 That's without dispute. 29:22 I started traveling up to Canada as a teenager, living in Minneapolis, driving 24 hours up into Manitoba, past the Pa, to fish at Reed Lake and a little lake called Lake Macrossin, where we crazily portaged our fishing boats through over beaver dams, over a hill, into this little lake. 29:42 I'm not quite sure why my dad thought we had to drive 24 hours to get good fishing, because for the last 40 years, I've been making an annual trip up to Lake of the Woods and 29:51 And I've got a place, Pipestone Point Resort, just south of Kenora, and I've enjoyed shore lunch, chomping on your walleye for virtually every year in the last 40 years. 30:00 My trips to, you know, the wonderful national parks, Banff, Jasper, Whistler Blackcomb, you know, always in terms of just getting the accommodation set, talking to people, you know, being greeted and, you know, 30:15 Those individuals who run the resorts, just the kindest people. 30:19 And again, it breaks my heart to see in one sporting event where America's national anthem was booed. 30:26 And again, I'm not assessing blame. 30:30 We come from the same basic heritage, Anglo-Saxon, Judeo-Christian. 30:36 Our governments, where they differ, they're still premised foundationally on the magnificent Magna Carta. 30:44 So I just want to start out because there will be things that will be critical here. 30:48 There's no doubt about it. 30:50 But I need to convey I love Canada and I genuinely love Canadians, and we need to repair that breach. 30:57 We need to focus on those areas of agreement and move forward as strong allies and strong nations. 31:09 Second point, I'm going to be violating my own basic rule in terms of opening statements. 31:13 I'm pretty much a till the hunt. 31:15 I say five minutes, six, seven hundred words. 31:17 But as we discussed yesterday and last night, this inquiry. 31:22 really does require the table being set, really taking a look at what's happened before. 31:28 So I'm going to drone on longer than that, but what I'll try and do is I'll probably interrupt myself, do a couple of charts. 31:35 I like charts, but I encourage, and I truly appreciate the members of parliament here showing up here. 31:42 Interrupt me, ask questions. 31:44 I think this should be a discussion, you know, rather than have, you know, long periods of, you know, the guy, I mean, you're a senator. 31:51 I'm 31:52 This is not your traditional vaccine. 32:00 And jot that down as a question to ask, and we'll kind of delve into definition of gene therapy, how they changed the definition of a vaccine during the pandemic. 32:08 But those are my first points. 32:12 And it seems you led with the question, too, just in terms of my background. 32:19 What I brought into... 32:21 The pandemic. 32:22 You know, I'm an accountant by educational training. 32:26 I ran a manufacturing plant for 30-some years, supplying, quite honestly, the medical device industry. 32:30 So I know all kinds of things about GMP and traceability and what the medical industry does to ensure quality. 32:38 I was GSGAC chair leading up to the pandemic. 32:44 And we held hearings on biotech simulations. 32:48 Again, we'll probably talk about Event 201 today. 32:51 There's nothing wrong in trying to prepare for these things. 32:54 The problem is we took those preparations, threw them all out the window, and engaged in what I would call tyranny. 33:02 Probably the most relevant part of my background that impacts how I approached COVID was the fact that our first child, our daughter Carrie, was born with a very serious congenital heart defect. 33:15 It was called transposition of the gray arteries. 33:16 So her aorta and pulmonary artery were reversed. 33:20 She, in effect, had two circulatory systems, one that just circulated blood through her lungs and one that circulated blood through the body. 33:26 Now, when you're in utero, that's fine because you've got holes in your heart that allows that blood to circulate. 33:33 So the first day of life, when she was diagnosed, a wonderful pediatric cardiologist came in at 1.30 in the morning, catheterized her, put that catheter through that hole in the heart, blew up a balloon, ripped it through that membrane, 33:49 to allow her blood to oxygenate. 33:52 They hoped it would be two years. 33:54 Care got downstream about eight months, at which point when her heart is the size of a small plum, in seven hours of open-heart surgery, they completely rebaffled the upper chain of her heart. 34:07 Now medicine has progressed to they just change the arteries, right? 34:10 Makes sense. 34:12 That was about a 50% mortality procedure back then, so they rebaffled the upper chain of her heart. 34:16 Her heart operates backwards to this day. 34:20 But she's 42 years old. 34:22 She's the mother of two wonderful children, my grandchildren, through surrogacy. 34:28 And I raise that issue because I come into the pandemic with just a deep appreciation for doctors, for nurses. 34:40 who in many respects are the primary caregivers. 34:44 Doctors come in and they've got all their expertise, but it's the nurses that are sitting there and putting the IV lines and watching the patients and providing the care. 34:54 A deep appreciation for it, a deep respect for how far medicine has advanced, what we can do. 35:05 I always heard the term medical practice and viewed that as a building, a clinic. 35:10 A hospital. 35:12 But it was during that period with my daughter, I realized what the term medical practice truly meant. 35:21 Practice. 35:23 It's how we have advanced medicine. 35:25 We've allowed doctors to take that Hippocratic oath, be first responsible to the patient, use their skill, use their training, and they practice medicine. Speaker 3
35:44 And the relationship between the patient and doctor should be inviolate. Speaker 5
35:51 That should be what should have been driving what we did during the pandemic. 35:58 Imagine what could have happened during the pandemic if we didn't have federal health agencies establishing these protocols, if we didn't have the experts who were completely wrong 36:13 But instead, if we allow doctors to be doctors, practice medicine, practice the new tools, the Internet. 36:25 You know, back in the Spanish flu, we didn't have antibiotics. 36:28 We didn't have the Internet to rapidly, instantaneously transmit information. 36:33 I don't know if you remember. 36:35 Remember those doctors in New York? 36:37 I remember one in particular, I knew his name at one point in time, but he would, after a 14 or 16 hour shift, he'd come in front of his little camera. 36:46 He would convey to his colleagues around the country, around the world, this is what we're seeing. 36:50 This is so unusual. 36:53 People are coming in ambulatory, talking with unbelievably low oxygen rates. 36:58 We've never seen anything like this before. 37:03 There were doctors in California that were using these cheap generic drugs and having success. 37:10 All those voices were silenced. 37:14 They were canceled. 37:16 And so if you ask my background, that's, you know, I came into this with a deep appreciation of reverence for doctors and medical establishments. 37:29 And I was profoundly, and I have been profoundly saddened by what we witnessed over the last five years. 37:39 So with that, let me start my, we'll continue my filibuster, but start my formal written testimony. 37:51 Distinguished members of Parliament, Mr. Allison, Mr. Buckley, 37:57 First of all, thank you for this opportunity to testify, but thank you for having the courage to hold this inquiry. 38:06 I thank all the witnesses for coming and testifying. 38:10 It's truly an honor. 38:13 Although the coronavirus pandemic has had a tragic and lasting impact on global society, I feel I understand why so many people want to forget what happened and simply move on. 38:24 But we can't. 38:26 Not if you want to ensure that the mistakes made in our miserably failed response to COVID aren't repeated the next time. 38:32 And right now, it just seems like some people are hoping and praying for next time. 38:36 It's sick. 38:38 It's hard not to believe that. 38:41 Without dispute, the early news and images coming out of China, Italy, and New York City as they were coping with SARS-CoV-2 were alarming. 38:49 Images of responders and health officials in moon suits and reports of COVID hotspots and deaths dominated news cycles. 38:57 We didn't know if this new virus would be as deadly as Ebola, with an infection fatality rate of 40%, MERS at 30%, or SARS-CoV-1, and an eight to 10% infection fatality rate. 39:12 But by March 17th, 2020, in an article published in Stat News, Stanford Professor John Ioannidis analyzed the data from the Diamond Princess cruise ship that had been quarantined due to a COVID outbreak. 39:27 From that data, Professor Ioannidis projected an infection fatality rate for SARS-CoV-2 of 0.125%, 0.125%. 39:35 The predicted rate is somewhere between 0.05 to 1%. 39:42 Now, perspective, an average flu season has an infection fatality rate of approximately 0.1%. 39:51 By April of 2020, Oxford Center for Evidence-Based Medicine was also predicting an IFR 39:58 ranging somewhere between 0.1% and 0.35%. 40:03 Probably no worse than a bad flu season. 40:06 Again, this is in March of 2020. 40:08 Because the rest of the world is freaking out. 40:11 We're starting to get data that, okay, this could be a deadly disease, particularly for elderly, particularly if you have certain comorbidities. 40:18 But for the rest of us, if you have a good immune system, it might be pretty bad flu. 40:23 Don't freak out. 40:26 I certainly wasn't immune to the early justifiable fear caused by the unknown, but those two predictions provided valuable perspective. 40:33 These my concerns and made me highly skeptical of the scare mongering and draconian response measures being proposed and implemented. 40:44 But fear was exactly what those in charge wanted to stoke. 40:49 So they can use that fear to increase their power and control over our lives. 40:55 Even though on February 8th, 2020, February 8th, Anthony Fauci privately confided to his diary a similar case fatality rate for COVID, quote, more likely 0.2 to 0.3% rather than 2%. 41:12 That's a quote in his diary. 41:15 With transmissibility, quote, like a bad influenza, unquote. 41:22 Publicly, 41:24 In his March 2020 testimony to the House Oversight Committee, he predicted overall mortality around 2% to 3%, 10 times higher. 41:38 It's about 10 times higher than the flu. 41:41 He used the scaremongering to push mandates and societal lockdowns that devastated, and I mean devastated people's lives and global economies. 41:51 In March 2020, 41:52 I publicly stated that we tragically lose 39,000 people in traffic fatalities each year, but we don't shut down our highways. 42:01 From the White House podium, Anthony Fauci said that comment was, quote, way out. 42:06 Actually, my comment was highly appropriate analogy. 42:10 There was no way we shut down our economy to slow the spread. 42:17 We had to continue on with our lives. 42:21 Now, federal workers could work from home, as could other white-collar office workers, teachers. 42:29 But blue-collar workers, the people who actually make our lives livable, make and deliver our food, other products that are necessities, they had to go to work to keep our economy operating, and they did. 42:44 The inequity of shutdowns didn't end with the disparity between blue- and white-collar workers. 42:49 Small Main Street businesses were shut down by government edict and went bankrupt, wiping out the lifetime savings of their owners. 42:58 But the big box stores, big tech giants, not only stayed opened, they thrived as their smaller competitors were destroyed. 43:10 Using Forbes World Billionaires List, Oxfam reported that the 2,357 billionaires on the global list increased their wealth by $3.9 trillion from March 30th to December 30th, 2020, due to the pandemic. 43:27 So let me interrupt myself right now, because I think this is, I want to put up a chart, and I've got the clicker. 43:35 I haven't quite understood why this chart, well, I actually do understand it. 43:40 But this chart or similar charts should have gotten a lot more attention. 43:45 What this chart shows are the blue bars. 43:48 Those are new cases per day. 43:53 The orange line is the percent of the U.S. population vaccinated. 44:00 Now, what's important about this chart? 44:02 First of all, recognize the number of new cases pretty well peaked by January of 2021. 44:09 Again, this is U.S. government data. 44:11 I'm not making this up. 44:12 This is real hard data. 44:14 And you can see how precipitously the new cases were falling. 44:20 The pandemic was fading. 44:23 By the time you had any kind of significant increase in vaccination, already by March, again, it's way down, and vaccination rates are only 12%. 44:36 Now, had the vaccine actually worked, I mean, the way I would have thought the vaccine actually working is once 60, 70 percent of Americans were vaccinated, you'd see just a long tail and the pandemic would be over. 44:50 That's not what happened. 44:53 You know, very early in the. 44:55 During the administration of the vaccines, I became aware of a Belgian doctor, Dr. Gert van den Bosch. 45:03 He's not only a doctor of veterinary medicine, but he's a PhD in virology. 45:10 He worked in all kinds of biotech businesses, Glasgow Smith Klein, Novartis. 45:16 He also worked for the Bill and Linda Gates Foundation and for Gavi. 45:21 This is a respected virologist. 45:23 He knows something about vaccines and immunology. 45:29 He was out saying that mass vaccination... 45:33 In the midst of a global pandemic, it was probably the worst possible thing you could do. 45:38 Because the virus, which evolves rapidly, would evolve to evade those vaccines. 45:47 And you would literally drive variants. 45:51 That second peak you see in this chart, that's Delta. 45:56 Which, according to the doctors that I knew, they were out there treating, actually treating COVID patients. 46:04 found it to be a far more deadlier variant than the Alpha. 46:09 This variant was followed by Omicron, which was less deadly but more transmissible. 46:16 So again, that's what we were actually dealing with, but public health officials, they weren't acknowledging this. 46:27 They want to make sure they got that experimental gene therapy in every arm. 46:31 Let me continue. 46:36 I've labeled those who impose multiple forms of pandemic tyranny on society, the COVID cartel, the Biden administration, federal health agencies, Big Pharma, the legacy media and big tech social media giants. 46:48 The assaults on freedom and other malign actions have been nothing short of breathtaking. 46:53 Mask mandates, forced lockdowns, vaccine mandates, suppression and censorship of the truth, lying to and withholding information from the public, vilifying and destroying the careers of doctors, 47:06 and others who disagreed with the cartel. 47:09 So much of what was being said and done by the Clover cartel simply made no sense. 47:14 Have we always believed that early disease detection prompts early treatment and produces better outcomes? 47:21 Why was that fundamental tenet of medicine not only ignored, but sabotaged? 47:27 Why were frontline doctors who had the courage and compassion to treat COVID patients from the start of the pandemic censored, vilified, 47:35 and had their careers destroyed. 47:37 How could health officials deny the effectiveness of natural immunity when approximately half of the people testing positive for COVID were asymptomatic? 47:48 Isn't that a sign that your natural immunity is preventing you from getting ill? 47:53 And yet they denied natural immunity. 47:56 They wanted that injection in every arm. 47:59 The NIH guideline for COVID was to get tested 48:03 If you tested positive, you'd go home and isolate yourself. 48:08 In other words, do nothing and hope you don't get so sick that you require hospitalization. 48:15 Far too often, the stories of COVID hospitalization were horrific. 48:22 Patients lost their freedom. 48:24 Family members could not visit and comfort dying loved ones. 48:28 Patient and family member requests to administer multi-drug protocols using cheap, widely available, FDA-approved generic drugs were rejected in favor of highly expensive remdesivir, which by the way, nurses often called run, death is near because it knocks out your kidneys and other organs, but also ventilators with a depressingly low rate of success. 48:53 Athlete America, who 4% of the world's population 48:58 all this medical technology, all these experts, all these federal health agencies accounted for 16% of COVID deaths globally. 49:10 And we won't talk about how those deaths were probably overstated. 49:14 I don't know how anybody could review the results of our response to COVID and conclude it was anything other than a miserable failure. 49:23 The human toll of the economic devastation caused by shutdowns 49:27 that didn't work is incalculable. 49:30 The global economic cost of our response to COVID has been estimated as high as $17 trillion. 49:39 Hundreds of thousands of lives were unnecessarily lost because early treatment was sabotaged to ensure a vaccine, an injection, would obtain emergency use authorization. 49:49 We'll talk about that. 49:50 I've got the FDA guidelines here. 49:52 Ask me that question. 49:54 The deaths and disabilities caused by the experimental gene therapy pushed on billions of people globally are still being denied. 50:02 But as you will hear over the next few days, they are real and devastating. 50:11 By the time the COVID vaccines obtained their emergency use authorizations, the cartel was firmly in control of the narrative. 50:18 Phrases such as, follow the science. 50:21 Remember that one? 50:23 And remember, who was the science? 50:25 Safe and effective. 50:27 No one is safe until everyone is safe. 50:29 Which, by the way, if the vaccines were that effective, why would you care whether somebody else is vaccinated? 50:36 As long as you. 50:37 I mean, it never made sense to me. 50:39 No one is safe until everyone is safe. 50:41 Or is everyone is vaccinated. 50:42 This is a pandemic of the unvaccinated. 50:46 Vaccinators will keep you from getting infected and spreading it. 50:48 If you get vaccinated, you will not die. 50:52 These phrases were used ad nauseum to bludgeon the public into submission. 50:58 A few months into the vaccine rollout, my investigations have shown that the FDA and CDC were not, were not doing sincere safety surveillance. 51:08 And it appears this willful ignorance was a worldwide phenomenon. 51:13 Every time one of their tools showed a safety signal, they denigrated that tool and stopped using it. 51:20 We have multiple emails to explain exactly why. 51:25 Making the public aware of safety signals would cause, quote, vaccine hesitancy. 51:31 They wanted that experimental gene therapy shot in billions of arms, and they weren't going to let anything stop them. 51:38 That attitude and objective continues to this day. 51:44 For perspective, in 1976, the swine flu vaccine program was terminated after approximately 45 million doses, resulted in 400 to 500 cases of Guillain-Barre AIDS syndrome and a couple dozen deaths being associated with that vaccine. 52:00 It was shut down. 52:02 They pulled the vaccines. 52:06 By the end of April 2021, just four and a half months in the COVID vaccine rollout, 52:12 VAERS was reporting 2,926 deaths worldwide, with 39.5% of those deaths occurring on the day of vaccination within one or two days. 52:24 And this is April 2021. 52:27 When I asked NIH Director Francis Collins directly about what VAERS was showing at that point in time, he acknowledged six deaths had been attributed to the Johnson & Johnson vaccine, but as to the other 2,920 deaths reported on VAERS, he simply and callously stated, 52:43 Senator, people die. Speaker 1
52:46 Senator, can I interrupt you? 52:48 You said I could interrupt you. 52:50 For those that don't know what VAERS is, would you maybe explain that term? Speaker 5
52:53 That is the CDC's Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System. 52:59 It's a voluntary system, and I'll enter into the record here, the CDC commissioned Harvard University Pilgrim Study. 53:08 When they looked at VAERS and reported it in 2010, 2011, 53:13 It only reports about 1% of adverse events. 53:17 Now, it's voluntary, but that's what VAERS is. 53:22 And, again, we should get into a much more robust discussion of VAERS. 53:27 By the way, when I asked Francis Collins about 2,920 deaths, when you go back, they were being deluged. 53:39 They had to be freaking out. 53:41 They hire a contractor to load them into the VAIR system. 53:45 They get them in, self-reported, and they need a contractor to do that. 53:49 That contractor had to hire another 290 people. 53:51 They were so backlogged. 53:53 The contractor's worst-case scenario prior to they got into this was 1,000 a day. 54:00 In 2021, we averaged 2,700 employees. 54:04 adverse events. 54:05 So again, they were so backlogged. 54:07 When I talked to Francis Collins, because I'm watching this stuff, and we'll talk about why I was watching this, because I had a conversation with Dr. Michael Eaton. 54:15 We need to talk about that. 54:18 There's only 2,920 deaths. 54:20 Now that we've actually got the VAERS system, we go back in history, by end of April, there were actually 6,971 deaths 54:30 Not 2,900, 6,900 deaths already reported. 54:34 Just hadn't been loaded in the system. 54:35 Wasn't public yet, with 40% of those occurring on the day of vaccination or within one or two days. 54:42 Okay, I know VAERS, they always say, doesn't prove causation. 54:46 I got that. 54:48 But that's a correlation. 54:49 I mean, 40% of deaths occurring on the day of vaccination. 54:53 I know if I had a loved one that went in perfectly healthy, got vaccinated, dropped dead, 54:59 Didn't wake up from their sleep. 55:00 I know what I blame, but our federal health agencies didn't. 55:06 That pretty well sums up U.S. federal health agencies' ongoing attitude regarding their limited concern over COVID vaccine injuries and deaths. 55:14 As a result of that indifference and lack of acknowledgement, those who have been vaccine injured are largely ignored and are unable to access effective treatment. 55:23 You want to know the reason I'm still doing this? 55:26 The reason I ran for third term? 55:30 It's because I got connected to the injection injured. 55:35 Nobody else was advocating for them. 55:38 That's why I am so appreciative. 55:39 God bless you for advocating for them and letting them tell the stories here over the next few days. 55:45 I'll go to my next chart. 55:48 So this chart, I guess in my mind, is famous. 55:53 Infamous to the, you know, to the 55:57 COVID cartel, because when I would talk about this chart and I would be on, let's say, a radio program, that radio host would be deplatformed by Facebook. 56:07 Now, these aren't my numbers. 56:11 These are numbers coming right off of the VAERS system and the Thayer system. 56:14 That's the FDA adverse event. 56:15 That's on drugs. 56:16 VAERS is about vaccines. 56:19 So what you need to understand about this, this is to date. 56:24 through April of this, no, through July of this year. 56:28 And what I was always doing, because again, I was advocating for early treatment using ivermectin, a Nobel Prize winning drug. 56:35 Hydroxychloroquine, that was actually targeted early on in the SARS-MERS as potentially an effective antiviral to treat SARS. 56:44 I was comparing the COVID injections and remdesivir to these other drugs. 56:51 And you can see ivermectin 56:53 in the scheme of things, is a pretty darn safe drug. 56:58 And yet the FDA mounted a campaign. 57:00 If you remember that famous tweet, come on, y'all aren't a horse. 57:06 And this is a Nobel Prize. 57:07 It saved I don't know how many millions of people from river blindness. 57:10 And now we find these antiparasitics have antiviral, possibly anti-cancer properties as well. Speaker 2
57:16 Senator. 57:17 But they're cheap. 57:18 Just on ivermectin, I mean, my understanding is as the World Health Organization, and I'm just picking a number which is likely accurate, but I think they've distributed about 400 million doses of that in the third world because it's so effective as an anti-parasite. 57:35 without any oversight, without any prescription at all. 57:39 And you already mentioned it had received a Nobel Prize. 57:42 It might be one of the most widely used and safest drugs in history. Speaker 5
57:46 And yet doctors had their medical license, if not pulled, threatened for curing people, curing them. 57:52 I mean, I had enough people contact me that I could refer to those very few or low percentage number of doctors who actually risked their careers to cure. 58:02 prescribed ivermectin, and I would hear remarkable stories. 58:05 You know, couldn't breathe within six hours. 58:07 All of a sudden, they got the breath back. 58:09 So, again, I am thoroughly convinced ivermectin worked, okay? 58:12 But it was denigrated. 58:16 You'll see, as of today, there's about 1.7 million adverse events reported worldwide to the VAERS system. 58:23 Again, VAERS is cumbersome. 58:24 It takes 30 to 45 minutes. 58:26 Doctors don't report things here. 58:28 But about 50 to 60, I think 60 to 70 percent of reports are by medical professionals. 58:35 The health agency is doing, oh, these are self-reported, a bunch of anti-vax fanatics. 58:40 No, I mean, a majority of these things are actually reported by medical professionals. 58:45 We're up to over 39,000 deaths. 58:48 Currently, it's about 24 percent of those deaths are occurring on the day of vaccination within one or two days. 58:54 So again, this chart, and I started producing this thing, I think to go along with my first hearing with the injection injured in Milwaukee in June of 2021, it's been censored. 59:06 People who've had me on, shown this thing, been deplatformed by Facebook, they just didn't want to look at the truth. 59:18 So again, as of July 31st, there were 1.7 million adverse events. 59:21 I won't repeat that. 59:25 As long as I can remember, when faced with a serious medical condition, the recommendation has been to seek a second and possibly a third opinion. 59:33 Once again, that basic tenet of medicine was violated. 59:36 Throughout this pandemic, only the narrative and recommended approach of the COVID cartel was allowed. 59:42 Anything contrary to the edicts was labeled dangerous misinformation or a brand new term for inconvenient truths, malinformation. 59:53 True information... 59:55 But boy, if it goes against that COVID cartel narrative, now it's malinformation. 1:00:01 As a U.S. 1:00:01 Senator, I tried to expose the insanity of our COVID response with hearings in 2020, when I was chairman of the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, and public events in 2021 and 2022 after we lost the majority. 1:00:13 In May 2020, my hearing featured Dr. Johnny Yanidis testifying about the Princess Cruise analysis and Dr. Pierre Corey for the first time testifying about the use of corticosteroids in hospital treatment. 1:00:25 I remember he was vilified after that hearing until I think about eight weeks later, they actually ran a trial of dexamethasone, which is corticosteroid, that was effective. 1:00:34 Now, they always underdosed it, so they didn't utilize it effectively. 1:00:38 But again, he was first vilified until he had a study that proved it would work. 1:00:44 In November, December 2020 hearings on early treatment, Drs. 1:00:46 Peter McCulloch, George Freed, Pierre Corey talked about the successful multidrug protocols using hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin. 1:00:55 My first public event after losing the majority was in June of 2021 in Milwaukee, where five vaccine-injured individuals told their stories. 1:01:03 In November 2020, I held another event on vaccine injuries, injection injuries in D.C. that included medical experts and the injection-injured. 1:01:11 On January 22, 2022, I hosted a five-hour-long public event in D.C. titled COVID-19, A Second Opinion. 1:01:18 That event was organized around Dr. McCulloch's four pillars of pandemic response, limiting the spread, early treatment, hospital treatment, and vaccination. 1:01:29 At that time, it had been viewed by over 5 million times, demonstrating the public's desire for more and better information. 1:01:36 I've continued to hold hearings to conduct oversight which were not ridiculed and vilified. 1:01:40 which has generally been the reaction, have been largely ignored by legacy media. 1:01:46 It is disheartening that so few in government, the medical establishment, and media have shown any interest in examining our destructive response to COVID. 1:01:54 And again, I applaud this inquiry's effort to overcome that apathy and the cover-up. 1:02:00 The good news is that after four years of Biden administration stonewalling my oversight requests, we have finally begun obtaining the documents required for a COVID reckoning. 1:02:10 The world owes a debt of gratitude to HHS Secretary Kennedy and his commitment to radical transparency. 1:02:18 Early releases were exposed to cover-up by U.S. federal health officials of the safety signals who were screaming at them and the lies they told the public. 1:02:30 Dr. Fauci's diary and text messages also confirmed that my oversight was on target and has revealed the truth. 1:02:37 Because the diary and text messages were Dr. Fauci's, 1:02:40 Even the legacy media who have been complicit in the COVID cover-up have been forced to report on it. 1:02:47 And I hope to report on this inquiry. 1:02:50 But uncovering and exposing the truth will not be easy. 1:02:55 The COVID cartel will never admit that they were wrong. 1:02:59 They can't afford to admit they were wrong because the body count from their corrupt actions is simply too high. 1:03:05 And unfortunately, considering who the members of the COVID cartel are, 1:03:10 They will use all the awesome power at their disposal to frustrate every effort to expose them and prove them wrong. 1:03:19 But once someone's eyes have been opened to the truth, it is almost impossible to close them. 1:03:24 As more and more people become aware of what has happened and what is happening, I have to believe truth will have the power to overcome the lies. 1:03:34 This inquiry is an important step in opening up more eyes. 1:03:40 With that, again, thank you for allowing me to testify. Speaker 2
1:03:48 Senator Johnson, when you're talking about Anthony Fauci, my understanding is he was the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease in the United States? Speaker 5
1:04:00 Correct. 1:04:00 He held that position for something like 40 years. 1:04:04 I think he retired as the highest paid government employee. 1:04:09 Issued 1:04:10 Billions of dollars for the grants, which came in pretty handy when he wanted to cover up his involvement in gain-of-function research that probably produced the coronavirus. 1:04:21 It has been revealed now in his diaries that he utilized government resources employees to apply for awards during the pandemic, which put over a million dollars in his pocket. 1:04:36 thereby certainly violating federal rules about utilizing federal employees and federal property for personal gain. 1:04:44 He's a bad man. Speaker 2
1:04:45 And I'm just wondering, because Canadians will be familiar, but I just I want to make sure that everyone understands. 1:04:51 So he held an official role and we will have seen him on TV standing first beside President Trump and then beside President Biden. 1:05:00 And isn't he the gentleman who said, basically, I am the science? 1:05:04 He was the main spokesman, I think, for the entire world, setting the case for COVID. 1:05:11 So I just want the audience, those watching, to understand that we're talking about the fellow that was on TV as the world expert directing this. 1:05:20 And you're saying when you talk about his diary, can you explain? 1:05:24 Because my understanding is that he basically kept a daily diary, an electronic diary, on a government server. 1:05:32 And that has now been disclosed to the public. Speaker 5
1:05:35 Now, first of all, it took us until literally about a month ago to obtain that. 1:05:41 We're still having a hard time. 1:05:43 Even though Secretary Kennedy is absolutely committed to radical transparency, there are, again, you still have the tens of thousands of bureaucrats inside Health and Human Services Department that were probably complicit in this. 1:05:56 They're sabotaging the effort. 1:05:57 They are not cooperating in terms of getting this information. 1:06:00 But yeah, because he kept his diary, 1:06:02 on government device, we were able to access that and finally show the public what a complete hypocrite he was. 1:06:11 And again, there have been, and I truly appreciate, I know Dr. Jessica Rose in the audience here, I mean, those people who've kind of crowdsourced that, I've literally not had time to read the 1,100 pages of that myself, but haven't had to because once that was made public, that transparency, we've had all kinds of people, the researchers that are reading that and revealing, he said this, 1:06:33 He confided this to his diary, but this is what he said publicly. 1:06:36 And again, I think the most egregious lie that he told the public was, again, when he privately was thinking is, you know, maybe twice the bad flu season, which you wouldn't shut down the economy for. 1:06:48 You wouldn't force an experimental gene therapy into billions of arms for something like a bad flu season. 1:06:56 And yet publicly, so he could impose those measures, so he could gain that level of control. 1:07:00 So I don't know, 10 times worse than the flu. 1:07:03 And continue to scaremonger, which, by the way, like he did with HIV. 1:07:10 He did the exact same thing. 1:07:11 I know I've been vilified for pointing that out, but it's true. 1:07:14 He scaremongered HIV. 1:07:16 He scaremongered the coronavirus pandemic as well. Speaker 3
1:07:22 Mr. Javadi. 1:07:42 It did work. Speaker 6
1:07:43 I guess it does work. 1:07:47 I'll try to be as brief as I can because I know there's a lot of people that have questions and want to ask, but this is wildly close to my heart. 1:07:57 So I'm looking at my phone because I made notes as you were speaking, Senator. 1:08:02 So number one, Dean MP Allison, thanks a million. 1:08:06 This is really, really well done. 1:08:08 I really appreciate you being such an amazing intervention for this, such an advocate for it. 1:08:16 I don't know how many Wednesday morning Ontario caucus meetings you brought this up. 1:08:23 And so I just want to say thank you from the bottom of my heart. 1:08:26 You truly have been a leader on all of this. 1:08:31 Secondly, Senator Johnson, 1:08:34 I've never had a chance to meet you before. 1:08:38 I can tell why you've been elected so many times. 1:08:41 You're really a real class act. 1:08:44 That's really awesome, especially in the midst of the midterms where you could be in the United States stumping for other folks. 1:08:53 You care enough to come here. 1:08:56 So thank you very much, Senator. 1:08:57 With that, and I mean this very honestly, if you ever want to have a really good fishing trip, 1:09:03 You contact me, we'll go to way Northern Ontario and we'll do a fly-in fishing trip. 1:09:09 I just happen to maybe know the person or maybe I own the outfitting business. 1:09:17 The reason this is so near and dear to my heart today, why it's so darn important for me to be here. 1:09:23 So I was elected at the end of 2019. 1:09:26 I call myself a 2019 political baby. 1:09:31 And everybody from the class of 2019 is in the same shoes as I am. 1:09:37 Because we literally were elected at the end of 2019. 1:09:40 I believe we got to sit in December for about two and a half weeks. 1:09:44 We got one week in January, two weeks in February, roughly. 1:09:49 And on March the 6th, they said, get home, go home now. 1:09:52 Don't come back. 1:09:53 It's way too scary. 1:09:54 And I remember literally leaving the House of Commons, them literally making the speaker making the announcement, get out now. 1:10:02 And we could have swore that the sky was falling, Senator. 1:10:07 That to be said is, all that to be said also is, because I was a political baby, I really only had about three months under my belt, Senator. 1:10:16 But let me tell you, sir, the amount of people that contacted my office. 1:10:22 So my riding is Essex, which is right next to Windsor. 1:10:27 So next to the busiest international border crossing in North America. 1:10:31 Doctors, nurses, first responders, business owners, everything come crashing down very, very quickly in that if they didn't get the shot, they didn't cross the border. 1:10:46 And so being a first responder myself, 1:10:53 I knew that I was hearing various stories from other locations and that if you don't get the shot, you don't respond to the fire department. 1:11:02 You can't be a home caregiver. 1:11:08 My parents were driving me crazy. 1:11:09 Chris, please get the shot. 1:11:11 Please get the shot. 1:11:11 And I said, I don't want the darn shot. 1:11:14 They said, please get the shot. 1:11:15 And the only thing that got me to get the shot is I realized I was representing 131,000 people from the great writing of Essex. 1:11:23 And I wasn't allowed back in the House of Commerce on the green carpet of the House of Commerce of Commons unless I got the shot. 1:11:32 That's the only reason I didn't get one but two shots so I could represent the people. 1:11:38 I'm going to take it a step further, and this is going to get personal. 1:11:41 And it's a good thing I got these right here. 1:11:46 As I do, I am leading up to a question, Mr. Allison. 1:11:53 Ironically, one of the people that was on my bum the most of getting the shot was my mother, my best friend. Speaker 3
1:12:04 And shortly after she got the shot, she came down with esophagus cancer. Speaker 6
1:12:16 And I'm not a conspiracy person, by the way. 1:12:20 I just want to put that on the record. 1:12:22 However, I just want to just, because I just got a text. 1:12:26 I asked somebody. 1:12:29 I just texted my father. 1:12:33 And the doctor called it turbo cancer. 1:12:40 The vaccine accelerates the spreads the cancer. 1:12:43 I'm not going to mention the doctor's name, but I do have it here on my phone. 1:12:50 He explained the same thing to my father. 1:12:51 London doctor said if the claim that made major settlements is possible. 1:13:00 I got through that one better than I thought I was going to, but I guess because I was reading. 1:13:04 I guess my question is, Senator, 1:13:10 By the way, I had a really good chat with Congressman Huizenga just a couple of weeks ago. 1:13:14 What a great man. 1:13:16 I guess my question to you is, have you heard about this acceleration of the turbo cancer? 1:13:23 Is that something that's on the radar? 1:13:26 I don't have any answers for it. 1:13:27 All I know is my best friend's been gone for about three years now. 1:13:30 And I realize everybody passes. 1:13:34 But I know it real fast. 1:13:35 She was in the hospital for 13 days. 1:13:38 Thank you, Mr. Ellison. Speaker 5
1:13:40 So, MP Lewis, first of all, my sincere condolences on your loss. 1:13:45 Now, I have absolutely heard of terrible cancers, the plausible mechanisms for the injection to cause cancer, and there's multiple plausible mechanisms for that. 1:13:59 We actually held a hearing a couple months ago about the plausible mechanisms of the injection causing cancer and the corruption of medical journals. 1:14:10 because one of our witnesses, Wafik Elduri, director of cancer for Brown University, until they stripped him of that title because he issued a study and published it on Oncotarget. 1:14:22 Oncotarget was immediately targeted or hit by denial of service attacks. 1:14:30 And he's been vilified ever since. 1:14:33 But now this has been a concern for really a number of years. 1:14:40 It's been largely covered up. 1:14:42 It's very difficult to prove. 1:14:47 Remember, what Pfizer did in its trial is very rapidly they unblinded the trial. 1:14:54 And so the placebo group also got injected. 1:14:56 So now you've lost the ability to monitor long-term serious side effects. 1:15:02 They knew what they were doing. 1:15:05 The best way to cover up side effects is unblind the placebo control group. 1:15:10 And you've lost all the data. 1:15:13 What I found very frustrating, still find frustrating, is it was almost impossible to get autopsies during COVID. 1:15:23 I mean, we've heard the stories of people breaking the neck in a motorcycle accident, being brought to the hospital, expiring in the emergency room, testing positive for COVID. 1:15:33 That was a COVID death. 1:15:36 But I would really urge anybody that has a suspicion on this is to request an autopsy and do a tissue sample and look for evidence to spike protein in those tumors. 1:15:47 And I think if we had the more autopsies we had, the more evidence we might mount that maybe, maybe the medical establishment, federal health agencies will at least open up their eyes to that possibility. 1:15:59 Because remember, this mRNA technology is not going away. 1:16:04 as much as those of us who view this as a deadly shot, this is a highly profitable platform. 1:16:11 They've been working on this for years. 1:16:13 I mean, this was their goal. 1:16:14 I mean, this was their opportunity, and they seized that opportunity. 1:16:18 In the U.S., we just had the Moderna flu mRNA vaccine injection approved. 1:16:28 And they approved it on the basis that it's only – 1:16:32 0.1% higher serious adverse events than the current flu shot. 1:16:38 This is not maybe a bad time to just talk about the difference between absolute versus relative risk. 1:16:46 Now, let's not do that. 1:16:50 Because we're talking about turbo cancers. 1:16:53 But again, I'll just conclude. 1:16:54 I think it's extremely important that anybody that suspects that requests at least a tissue sample and get it. 1:17:02 And I'm not sure the, you know, Jessica Rose can probably tell you later on exactly what the test is, but test to see whether there's any evidence of a spike protein in a particular tumor. 1:17:12 No. 1:17:13 Dr. Angus Dalglish, highly respected oncologist from 1:17:19 London also testified at a hearing. 1:17:22 And again, he's, and just clinically, he just sees these turbo cancers, you know, people in complete remission and their cancers come roaring back. 1:17:30 But it's just one of those things that federal health officials, Big Pharma, Pfizer, Moderna, they're just burying their heads in the sand because they don't want to look at it. 1:17:37 They don't want to admit it. Speaker 1
1:17:43 Mr. Jivani. Speaker 7
1:17:46 Thank you, MP Allison. 1:17:47 Thank you, Mr. Buckley. 1:17:49 So, Senator Johnson, thank you for being here and thank you for your comments and sharing your observations and what you learned through your process. 1:17:57 You know, we heard at the beginning, before you spoke, about some of the stigma around this discussion and how difficult it was for some people who want to share their personal stories and how their families have been affected to even be here today or be here over the course of this week. 1:18:15 It's a bit, it's one of those examples of what I feel is a war on common sense in politics that often takes place. 1:18:24 So it is puzzling to me that on one hand, we can have a political culture where talking about these issues is controversial or difficult. 1:18:34 And yet on the other hand, we literally have a program in the federal government 1:18:39 designed to compensate people for vaccine injury so just to give you some background i don't know how familiar you are with it in canada but since june of 2021 there has been what was then called the vaccine impact assistance program has since been renamed um or sorry at the time it was called the vaccine injury support program now it is called the vaccine impact assistance program and um 1:19:05 Since June of 2021, over 3,500 claims have been filed. 1:19:11 Over 250 have been successfully approved by the Medical Review Board. 1:19:16 And over $21 million of Canadian taxpayer money has gone from the federal government to compensate people deemed to be vaccine injured. 1:19:25 So it is confusing that that could be happening with our public dollars. 1:19:30 And at the same time, this is considered a controversial thing to talk about. 1:19:35 So I think two questions I'd like to ask you for your thoughts on. 1:19:39 One is in terms of the specifics of vaccine injury, or as you put it, injection injury, what kind of data do you think our government should be collecting for programs like this to be optimally successful? 1:19:55 Because right now it has gone from what was a third party administered program over the last four and a half years 1:20:01 to now being a government administered program, which in theory means we can collect better data than we have been. 1:20:08 And I think it would be good to get your thoughts on what kind of data and what kind of questions our government should be asking. 1:20:15 The second question I have for you is just 1:20:18 Why do you think the war on common sense seems to be so effective on this issue? 1:20:23 And I would say since I became a member of parliament two years ago, on many other topics, it seems like there is a gap between the kind of sensible conversations that Canadians are able to have with each other versus what we are able to talk about effectively in political spaces. 1:20:43 Is it MP Jivani? Speaker 5
1:20:45 Jivani. 1:20:46 Jivani, okay. 1:20:47 First of all, thanks for coming. 1:20:49 Thanks for your interest here. 1:20:50 This is actually an area where Canada is ahead of America in terms of the compensation of these injection injured. 1:20:56 I think our program is CICP. 1:20:58 I think it's Countermeasure Injection Compensation Program. 1:21:03 Last time I looked, we literally had paid out less than $100,000. 1:21:07 Now, it's probably more than that now. 1:21:09 We've got something, I think, 11,000 people on the list. 1:21:14 It's very similar to the childhood vaccine injury program in America, too. 1:21:18 The way they manage the funds is they just deny vaccine injuries. 1:21:24 They deny injection injuries. 1:21:26 So there's obviously a certain narrow type of injury that they've kind of acknowledged, like myocarditis or something like that. 1:21:35 And they'll begrudgingly, OK, we'll approve that. 1:21:38 But they fight these things tooth and nail. 1:21:41 The dollar amounts, I mean, the liability, if these programs were actually administered honestly, would literally be in the hundreds of billions of dollars. 1:21:52 I mean, the expense, I'll choose Breanne Dressen. 1:21:57 Again, she testified in my June 2021 hearing. 1:22:02 By the way, at least two or three of them in that initial event I had, 1:22:09 They volunteered for the trials. 1:22:12 She was subjected to the AstraZeneca trial and severely injection. 1:22:19 She literally has hundreds of thousands of dollars of bills. 1:22:23 Of course, AstraZeneca, I think at one point sent her a check in settlement of all claims, something like $1,300 or $1,700. 1:22:32 I mean, these pharmaceutical companies completely abdicated their responsibility to the trial participants. 1:22:38 They just turned their back and walked away. 1:22:41 Got liability protection, right? 1:22:43 So it's really sick. 1:22:45 You know, as a fiscal conservative, you know, I fear the dollar amount that we're going to owe these people if they're actually treated fairly. 1:22:58 It would literally be, I believe, hundreds of billions of dollars. 1:23:01 Again, we got, I think, Bree just sent this to me, by the way. 1:23:04 React 19, and they've got a corollary group here in Canada. 1:23:10 React 19 has 40,000 members in the U.S., 20-plus partners, organizations all over the place. 1:23:18 75% of their members never had COVID. 1:23:21 So it's not long COVID, which is, I think, the big thing. 1:23:24 escape hatch that's being used by public health officials for a lot of these injection injuries. 1:23:29 Well, it's long COVID. 1:23:30 Now it's injection injuries. 1:23:33 53% of their members had the onset within 24 hours, 80% onset within a week. 1:23:41 Surveyed over three years, only 5% have recovered. 1:23:45 94% have symptoms, three or more organ systems, complex multisystem syndrome. 1:23:51 And we can maybe read you later. 1:23:53 Janet Woodcock's, uh, 1:23:55 email that we now have made public where she was hearing from these folks and admitted that this is going to be very difficult to diagnose. 1:24:04 Unfortunately, where you're behind, at least in America, there are some doctors, very few, who are willing to acknowledge these injection injuries and treat the patients. 1:24:15 Here in Canada, there are few of none. 1:24:20 And Brie told me a story. 1:24:23 While she was actually testifying one of my events, they were contacted by an injection-injured Canadian citizen, a mom, whose husband left her, whose husband told her children to leave her. 1:24:42 And she was so despondent that I guess Canada has a way out. 1:24:51 By the way, I always knew that Canada had an assisted suicide program. 1:24:56 I never realized until Brito. 1:24:58 You have an acronym for it. 1:25:00 MADE. 1:25:02 When I heard of that, the first thing I thought of was Logan's Run. 1:25:06 That science fiction of its dystopian future. 1:25:10 Where they force executed people once they reach 30. 1:25:15 They called it Renew. 1:25:18 But unfortunately, that mom... 1:25:22 availed herself of MAID, that dystopic acronym, and lost, you know, had medically assisted, or medical assistance in dying, I guess what it stands for. 1:25:38 That's what they helped her. 1:25:41 So what we found after that June 2021 event, I want to talk a little bit about this, is because that was misinformation. 1:25:51 Right. 1:25:51 That was that was malinformation. 1:25:54 And so it's been it's been discovered through the Missouri, Louisiana lawsuit against Dr. Fauci and the Biden administration. 1:26:02 The Biden administration is putting a lot of pressure on these social media companies to police and shut down and, you know, de-platform misinformation. 1:26:12 So Facebook shut down their support groups. 1:26:16 So these people who are being gaslit, whose doctors are saying it's all in your head, weren't getting treatment anywhere other than at NIH. 1:26:24 And we should talk about that from my report. 1:26:27 The only solace they had were their support groups on Facebook and other social media. 1:26:34 And so after Bree and these four other brave individuals just told their story to the Milwaukee press, Facebook started shutting down the support groups. 1:26:47 So they had no solace. 1:26:50 So suicide rates, unassisted suicide rates within the U.S. REACT-19 groups increased. 1:26:58 And by the way, they're increasing now. 1:27:01 In that event, their plea was they just wanted to be seen, heard, and believed. 1:27:09 You'll probably hear that over the next, they just, they want to be seen, they want to be heard, they want to be believed. 1:27:16 So they can access treatment. 1:27:25 We got to get into much greater detail, but in my April 29, 2026 report, where the real revelation is Peter Marks was warned that the algorithm was going to cover up safety signals. 1:27:38 They were shown safety signals. 1:27:39 They deny them to this day. 1:27:41 In the same report, we also reveal that in March of 2020, 1:27:48 A study was being undertaken by a doctor named Dr. Nath within the NIH and a team of researchers where they were diagnosing and treating people like Brianne Dressing. 1:28:02 So they were acknowledging the injection injuries. 1:28:03 They were treating them somewhat successfully. 1:28:08 They told, I think it was, I can't remember, something like 23, I can't remember the exact number of people being treated. 1:28:15 They told them, be quiet. 1:28:18 Tell no one. 1:28:19 We don't want to disseminate the information until we complete the study and we can go to the medical community and we can tell, okay, here's the best practice for treating your injuries. 1:28:28 And, of course, they weren't going to tell anybody because they wanted to continue to be treated. 1:28:34 The problem is they never went public. 1:28:38 The injection injured, people like Bree were told, and actually Dr. Nath told her before the June 21st event, you know, make this point. 1:28:48 that early intervention is crucial to successful treatment. 1:28:56 At the NIH, CDC, FDA, they never, they never, well, eventually they took that study in like the summer of 2022, put it on a preprint server and told no one. 1:29:10 So to this day in America, there's not guidance. 1:29:13 There's not guidance. 1:29:14 The FDA and I say, hey, these injection injuries are real, and here's the best we know in terms of treating them right now. 1:29:22 They haven't done that. 1:29:24 Which, again, is why this inquiry is so vitally important for those people that were harmed by this countermeasure. Speaker 3
1:29:38 Senator Johnson, early on at Speaker 2
1:29:40 you had mentioned that you wanted to speak about whether or not the COVID-19, what we call vaccines are vaccines or something else. 1:29:49 Can you address that for us now? 1:29:51 Sure. Speaker 5
1:29:51 It was not so curious, but suspicious that September of 2021, let me back up. 1:30:07 Remember how safe and effective these things are, right? 1:30:11 But we all had to get injection because nobody's safe to tell. 1:30:14 Everybody is injected. 1:30:17 And again, you know, Fauci on May 16th, Fauci said people get the vaccine become dead end to the virus and transmission was extremely unlikely. 1:30:30 But three days later, you're saying, well, I need a booster. 1:30:36 In July 2021, Biden said, you're not going to get COVID if you get these vaccinations. 1:30:40 On December 14th, he said, this is a pandemic of the unvaccinated. 1:30:43 Make sure you're vaccinated so you don't spread the disease. 1:30:46 That's the message, right? 1:30:47 Got to get vaccinated. 1:30:47 If you do, you're not going to die. 1:30:49 This is a pandemic of the unvaccinated. 1:30:54 But in July of 2021, in Provincetown, Massachusetts, they began reporting a major outbreak of breakout cases. 1:31:06 People who are fully vaccinated getting COVID. 1:31:09 By the way, I think the number one adverse event of a COVID injection was getting COVID. 1:31:16 Don't tell anybody that. Speaker 2
1:31:18 Can I just stop you and keep you on that point for a minute? 1:31:21 Because there were some chuckles here. 1:31:24 But there's actually a lot of research, I think the first being the Cleveland Clinic, showing that with each shot, you're more likely to catch COVID. 1:31:34 And I know many people watching that we're going to be calling an expert later in these proceedings using Ontario data for the first time, showing that, you know, after about six months into the vaccination program, you are more likely to get COVID if you are vaccinated than not. 1:31:51 And I think for a lot of people, that is a new idea and shocking. 1:31:56 For people that believe our concerns are long COVID, thank goodness. 1:32:00 we took the vaccine or we had the vaccine to reduce long COVID, it might be a shock to be, no, the vaccines caused COVID. 1:32:07 The leading, likely the leading side effect of the COVID-19 vaccine was COVID. 1:32:13 It's like negative efficacy when they say, well, safe and effective. 1:32:16 Well, effective at what? 1:32:18 Effective at getting COVID. 1:32:19 So can you spend a bit of time on that? 1:32:21 Because I can assure you that it's a brand new idea to many people viewing. Speaker 5
1:32:26 Well, again, definitely quiz people like Dr. Jessica Rose here about, you know, 1:32:30 With every booster shot, I think it was after the third or fourth booster, the antibodies that it produced, IG4, are the same antibodies that an allergist tries to boost up with you because it suppresses your immune system to the allergen. 1:32:46 So you don't get all inflammation, that type of thing. 1:32:50 I think, again, they actually understand the mechanism because they're testing type of antibodies with each successive booster. 1:32:56 So that would be one plausible mechanism. 1:32:59 But, again, I'm not a doctor, not a medical researcher. 1:33:00 That's my layman's knowledge of that. 1:33:05 There was another point I was trying to make within that, too. Speaker 2
1:33:09 Repeat your question on the... Well, I'm just hoping you can really parse out that... 1:33:15 a side effect of the vaccine is COVID itself, that really we're dealing with negative efficacy. Speaker 5
1:33:20 So the point I wanted to make, and this is kind of another one of those things like, well, if you're so sure the vaccines are effective, why do you care when somebody else is vaccinated? 1:33:31 I was never an anti-vaxxer, okay? 1:33:33 I got them all, okay? 1:33:35 I didn't get this because it's not a vaccine. 1:33:38 And I talked to Michael Yeadon. 1:33:40 But what has always astonished me 1:33:46 was the arrogance of people like Fauci, like Peter Hotez, like Paul Offit, like, oh God, I'm trying to think of the godfather of all, Stanley Plotkin, okay? 1:34:03 I mean, what is a vaccine or what is this gene therapy? 1:34:06 What does it impact to the body? 1:34:08 What does it, the immune system, right? 1:34:12 What kind of arrogance is, 1:34:14 Would you lead you to believe, yeah, but what we're producing here, all these vaccines, you know, this injection will only have a positive impact on the immune system. 1:34:24 Won't do anything negative. 1:34:26 It's only going to enhance your immune system. 1:34:31 How do they know that? 1:34:34 I've stated a number of times in some of my public events of the very tail end is. 1:34:39 I am. 1:34:41 truly amazed at how much knowledge mankind has accumulated over the millennia, how rapidly our knowledge is increasing. 1:34:51 But that being said, no matter how much we know, I would argue that what we don't know vastly exceeds what we do. 1:35:01 And when you come into any situation, I think you need to bring that level of humility and modesty into diagnosing the problem. 1:35:12 But, no, again, I've heard the medical explanations. 1:35:16 Probably didn't do a very good job. 1:35:17 You'll have other experts, McCulloch, Jessica Rose, do a good job. 1:35:20 But, no, I think that's a definite real phenomenon. 1:35:23 I'm fully aware of it. 1:35:25 And I've heard a plausible mechanism of why getting more and more boosters actually starts reducing your immune system and increases the likelihood. 1:35:35 I think Fauci got COVID a couple times. 1:35:41 By the way, he also had a pulmonary infarct, which was one of the side effects that Peter Marks and senior FDA officials were warned about in March of 2021. 1:35:52 Pulmonary infarction, sudden cardiac death. 1:35:56 They were warned about that. 1:35:57 June of 2021, in his diary, he admits that definitely he had a pulmonary infarct and told no one. Speaker 1
1:36:09 So can I ask another question? 1:36:10 You talked about what they knew versus what they told people. 1:36:14 Could you talk a bit about the timeline? 1:36:16 Was there like, you know, when they knew something versus when they told the public? 1:36:22 So let's. Speaker 3
1:36:23 So on February 8th. Speaker 5
1:36:39 I don't want to conflate things here. 1:36:40 I mean, I'm going to set aside what Fauci knew. 1:36:42 I'm going to talk about my April 29th, what I would consider a bombshell report. 1:36:51 My staff, I got, we're not very serious about oversight, truthfully, in the United States Senate and Congress. 1:36:56 We want to spend money, but, you know, let's not worry about how we spend it. 1:37:00 So even though I'm the premier subcommittee of investigations in the Senate, 1:37:05 unlimited unilateral subpoena power, I've got six full-time investigators. 1:37:10 So HHS, the people inside the agency, when Bobby Kennedy demanded that they be transparent, they didn't give us the information to our targeted requests, communications between these two. 1:37:22 They dumped 11 million pages on us. 1:37:24 Boom. 1:37:25 That was not designed to help us. 1:37:27 But fortunately, I've got good staff and we have things like AI and search engines. 1:37:32 So out of that 11 million pages, 1:37:34 My staff, first of all, uncovered that they admitted to a signal on myocarditis in May, and rather than issue a full health alert network, clinical considerations on their website. 1:37:51 So rather than say, okay, we have a signal for myocarditis, let's warn the medical community so they're on the lookout, right? 1:37:59 So when a young person comes in, ask him the question, when did you get vaccinated? 1:38:03 So we get some sense, I mean, is it a real signal or not? 1:38:06 That's not what they did. 1:38:07 They quietly issued a clinical consideration. 1:38:11 But that's minor compared to the real bombshell, which is on March 1st of 2021, one of the premier data mining experts within FDA, Dr. Anna Sharfman, working with the inventor of 1:38:27 of the algorithm that analyze VAERS, Bill Dumaschel from Oracle, briefed Dr. Peter Marks, who is head of CBER, the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Review or whatever. 1:38:45 But they approve vaccines and they do safety surveillance. 1:38:48 So they warned him that the current algorithm that they're using to analyze this deluge of VAER reports 1:38:56 was going to hide and mask safety signals. 1:39:00 And they told him, we've got a new algorithm. 1:39:03 It's just going to unmask them. 1:39:04 So they did a data run. 1:39:06 And by March 26, they presented to senior FTA officials a data run. 1:39:12 And I'll go to my chart here. 1:39:16 We've assembled this. 1:39:17 But these are the safety signals. 1:39:20 And you can't really read this, but you'll have to go with me here. Speaker 3
1:39:28 I want to find the exact route. Speaker 5
1:39:35 Using the new algorithm, they uncovered 26 ATC notes, including things like sudden cardiac death, pulmonary infarction, Bell's palsy, different types of strokes, agonal stroke, basal ganglia stroke. 1:39:48 You can see the list. 1:39:50 It's on my website. 1:39:53 But rather than tell the public... 1:39:56 They ended up telling Dr. Anna Sharsman to cease and desist. 1:40:00 Don't do any more data runs. 1:40:02 You work at CEDAR, not CBER. 1:40:04 Why are we allowing Dr. Sharsman to have access to their data? 1:40:08 Shut it down. 1:40:11 So the world has to understand that by March of 2026 or 2021, three months into the administration of these injections, the FDA knew that 1:40:26 But there are safety signals, including sudden cardiac death. 1:40:30 And they told no, they are covering up to this day. 1:40:33 And by the way, so I guess, Sean, you have a question. Speaker 2
1:40:40 I just want to make sure I understand what you're saying, because I think it's important for people to understand. 1:40:44 So people are reporting to this adverse reaction system called VAERS. 1:40:49 And so there's all these reports. 1:40:51 And the FDA has a computer program. 1:40:54 to analyze those reports to show if there's any safety signals. 1:40:59 The person who made the program, who wrote the program the FDA is using, says actually the program you're using is going to hide safety signals. 1:41:09 I've rewritten the program so that it doesn't hide safety signals. 1:41:14 The term was masking. 1:41:16 And the FDA refused to use the new program from the actual person that wrote the program they're currently using saying it doesn't work. 1:41:23 But another person within the FDA who also is involved in writing the program ran the data anyway, using the new program. 1:41:31 And it showed horrific safety signals. 1:41:35 And so the FDA is being told your program's wrong, like by the guy who wrote the program. 1:41:41 And they're being shown data with the corrected program showing horrific safety signals. 1:41:47 And they actually tell the person, stop running the data. 1:41:50 Right. 1:41:51 Like, stop creating this data of harm. 1:41:53 And just, and correct me if I'm wrong, but my understanding is, is, is so like, let's say there were 10,000, I'm just making figures up, but let's say there were 10,000 reports of myocarditis, like, you know, for the Pfizer vaccine. 1:42:07 The problem with their program is, is if there were also 10,000 reports of myocarditis, 1:42:12 With the Moderna vaccine, it would look at the two and say, well, I don't really see a big change in the Pfizer. Speaker 5
1:42:19 Let me just, so I put up a new chart here. 1:42:22 And what this is, is these are deaths reported to VAERS on an annual basis since VAERS was established in 1990. 1:42:29 And through 2020, before the COVID injection, on average, VAERS would have 280 deaths per year reported on VAERS. 1:42:39 Okay, 280. 1:42:42 the year of the injection, 2021, over 21,000 death reports. 1:42:48 21,000. 1:42:50 Now, again, I don't need a sophisticated algorithm to tell me, wow, that's a serious safety signal screaming at me, right? 1:42:59 And in this kind of analogy I used last night, roughly the 21,000 deaths, about half of them were associated with Pfizer, half of them were associated with 1:43:11 The Moderna. 1:43:12 And so the masking issue, you didn't need to be a data mining specialist to realize we can't do that. 1:43:19 What they would do is they compared, they looked at Pfizer. 1:43:23 And so these algorithms are looking for disproportionality. 1:43:27 What's out of whack? 1:43:30 What isn't matching with, for example, what we see with other vaccines, right? 1:43:34 So what they did is they looked at Pfizer, 10,000 deaths. 1:43:38 But they compared it against Moderna at 10,000 plus the 280 other normal deaths. 1:43:44 So you're looking at 10,000 versus 10,280. 1:43:50 Nothing to see here. 1:43:50 I mean, you know, equally safe, equally dangerous. 1:43:53 Then they looked at Moderna, 10,000 deaths. 1:43:56 Compare that to Pfizer, 10,000 plus the 280. 1:44:01 Nothing to see here, boss. 1:44:04 Again, they knew it. 1:44:05 I mean, we've now got emails that are, like in 2024, oh, we're aware of that limitation of, boy, we dodged a bullet. 1:44:15 I can say, no, we can't change algorithms. 1:44:18 That would be wrong. 1:44:20 This hasn't been fully, this algorithm hasn't been tested. 1:44:22 We've got to stick with the algorithm we've been using for years. 1:44:27 Hide safety signals. 1:44:29 So I can go to the American public, I can go to the global public and say, 1:44:33 We're just not seeing safety signals. 1:44:36 And I can tell you, we are now starting to interview some of these people involved in this. 1:44:42 They're completely unrepentant. 1:44:46 It's literally like a two-year-old. 1:44:51 You can't have a cookie. 1:44:52 You hear the cookie jar break. 1:44:54 You go in there. 1:44:54 The kid's got a cookie in his hand. 1:44:57 I said he couldn't have a cookie. 1:44:58 I don't have a cookie. 1:45:00 Yeah, you do. 1:45:01 It's like talking to a wall. 1:45:06 They look at this and not see anything here, which I got to bring up one of my oversight letters. 1:45:17 This was written on December 21st, 2023. 1:45:26 Because we're hearing this. 1:45:28 So, well, I mean, Senator, I mean, you got there were billions of doses done given. 1:45:32 You know, I mean, still, I mean, this is a fraction. 1:45:35 I mean, this is still these still rare and mild. 1:45:39 Right. 1:45:39 I don't know. 1:45:40 Sudden death. 1:45:41 Twenty one thousand. 1:45:42 I don't consider that rare or mild, but that's what that's what they say. 1:45:44 Rare and mild. 1:45:45 Billions of doses. 1:45:47 So I start asking, what's the death per dose? 1:45:50 So this is in 2023 with data available. 1:45:53 So we compared the death per million doses of COVID injection versus the flu. 1:45:59 And again, you don't have real good data here, but as good as we could do, we calculated that there were 25.5 deaths per million doses of the COVID injection. 1:46:12 Versus the flu, and we know how many doses were distributed. 1:46:16 We don't know what was administered, so we took the midpoints. 1:46:18 We assume 70% of doses distributed were administered. 1:46:22 If you do that with a flu vaccine, you end up with 0.46 deaths per million dose. 1:46:29 So the whole argument that, well, yeah, well, there's so many deaths because there's so many, there are billions of doses. 1:46:33 Okay, well, what's it per million doses? 1:46:36 25.5 per million doses versus 0.46. 1:46:41 That's a 55-fold increase. 1:46:43 And so I write that letter to HHS Secretary Becerra on December 21st, 2023. 1:46:50 This is actually a rapid response. 1:46:52 I get it in June. 1:46:54 All you get is pages and pages of, you know, we do all this phenomenal safety surveillance, you know. 1:47:06 They tell you nothing. 1:47:08 They don't address this. 1:47:11 They don't confirm your numbers. 1:47:14 Again, that's what I've been dealing with until Bobby Kennedy got there. 1:47:17 Now we're actually using some information. 1:47:18 So my investigations really have only just begun. 1:47:23 I wish we were a lot further along, but they've only just begun. Speaker 1
1:47:25 Okay, I think we're going to take a 10-minute break right now. 1:47:31 When we come back, Mr. Dawson, you have a question. 1:47:33 Just for those that need to use the washroom, then we'll be right back. 1:59:39 Okay, welcome back. 1:59:41 We're just going to keep, I got a number of people on the list here. 1:59:43 I've got Mr. Dawson, and then I've got Mr. 1:59:45 Folk. Speaker 8
1:59:47 Thanks, Dean. 1:59:49 Thank you, Senator Johnson, for being here. 1:59:51 I think it's important that we hear your testimony today. 1:59:54 On October 5th, 2021, the Canadian Broadcast Corporation headlined a story titled, Anxious About Unvaccinated Guests at Thanksgiving. 2:00:03 Here's some advice for those difficult discussions. 2:00:08 The byline for that story said, and I quote, I think it's fair to ask the question, have you been vaccinated or not? 2:00:15 Ontario top doctor said. 2:00:18 It went on to say, and I quote, people shouldn't hesitate to set personal boundaries around what they feel is COVID safe and what isn't COVID safe. 2:00:25 And if another person has a problem with that, will we have the right to set our own personal limits and boundaries? 2:00:32 Here in Canada, perhaps more than in the U.S., Canada trusts our government and media for fair, honest reporting to help make informed decisions. 2:00:40 If you would comment for me on how you feel reporting around the COVID pandemic, and in particular reporting around the vaccines has impacted trust in public health and the legacy of media reporting in the U.S. and here in Canada. Speaker 5
2:00:53 Well, first of all, I think it's just a shame that so many public health officials from around the world 2:01:02 listen to Anthony Fauci and listen to the Peter Marks of the world that were covering all this up. 2:01:10 Again, as an American, I really regret that. 2:01:15 But I think what it showed was the tendency of people in power to want to increase their power. 2:01:26 I talked about our shared heritage with Magna Carta, which is really about 2:01:33 individual liberty and freedom, right? 2:01:35 One thing I didn't tell about myself, I'm not a fan of government. 2:01:43 I know I serve in it, but I think the American founders were geniuses in the fact that they realized that we're not angels. 2:01:52 If you don't want to live in anarchy and chaos, you need government, but it needs to be limited because 2:02:02 Government's not capable of fixing our problems. 2:02:06 But from my standpoint, our founders realized this government's something to fear. 2:02:11 Because as government grows, our freedoms recede. 2:02:14 And if there's a one word definition of government, it's power. 2:02:21 Government can impose the capital punishment, right? 2:02:25 There's no greater power. 2:02:26 So government is power. 2:02:29 And as British Lord Acton appropriately said, 2:02:33 said one time is, you know, power corrupts. 2:02:36 Absolute power corrupts absolutely. 2:02:38 And I've witnessed now. 2:02:41 Again, coming into government because we were mortgaging our kids' future, I knew Obamacare wouldn't work. 2:02:46 That's the reason I ran in 2010 as part of the Tea Party movement. 2:02:50 But I came with a goal of how do you limit the size, scope, and cost of government so we can retain our freedom? 2:02:58 And if COVID taught us one thing is you give government officials power, they're going to just want more. 2:03:06 And that's what we witnessed. 2:03:08 And so I'm not sure that really necessarily answers your question, but that's kind of my philosophy on things. 2:03:14 I think the solution here isn't fixing government. 2:03:18 It's not making it bigger. 2:03:20 The solution literally is limit the powers, as I said earlier, what could have been if 2:03:27 federal officials globally would have allowed doctors to be doctors and practice medicine and utilize the tools we had, the cheap generic drugs, the internet to disseminate information. 2:03:39 I think we would have been, again, I remember Pierre Corey coming in early December with a manuscript. 2:03:46 He had all these studies of the effectiveness of ivermectin. 2:03:49 He said, pandemic's over. 2:03:51 Just get me on that stand and, you know, get me in front of NIH. 2:03:53 I'll deliver that manuscript. 2:03:54 We know how to treat this, okay? 2:03:57 Boy, I said, I wouldn't be so sure. 2:04:00 And I hate to admit that I was right and he was wrong. 2:04:03 It didn't end because they didn't want it to end. Speaker 8
2:04:06 I just got one more question. 2:04:08 Millions of people seem to have lost transparency in government, and especially now medical professionals, it seems. 2:04:16 Where do we go from here? 2:04:17 Where do we go as governments? 2:04:20 Where do we go as the vaccine injurers? 2:04:23 How do we move forward? Speaker 5
2:04:25 Well, as I said, this inquiry in Canada is an incredibly important step in the process. 2:04:32 We need a complete COVID reckoning. 2:04:35 I mean, it's not just injection injuries, as much as that was the reason I ran for third term, just to advocate for them. 2:04:43 We'd go all the way back, and maybe this is a good time to talk about what led us here. 2:04:48 Gain-of-function research. 2:04:50 What 2:04:51 What are we doing? 2:04:52 It is insane. 2:04:53 I mean, I really give Senator Paul a great deal of credit. 2:04:56 I mean, he's been on that doggedly now for years. 2:05:00 I have to admit, I've not been as interested in investigating the origins of COVID because I pretty well assumed it was man-made very early on with the fear and cleavage site, what I knew about Ralph Baric and Peter Daszak and the Wuhan lab. Speaker 1
2:05:15 But what are we doing Speaker 5
2:05:19 creating these chimeric, highly dangerous, highly pathogenic viruses. 2:05:27 Wait for nature to do it, and we'll address it then. 2:05:30 But again, I believe the reason we're doing it is to evade the biologic weapon conventions and treaties, right? 2:05:38 Because the out, the loophole as well, if you're creating these dangerous pathogens, these viruses, it's okay as long as you're doing it to create 2:05:49 the vaccines and injections, the countermeasures. 2:05:52 So we need a very honest reckoning. 2:05:56 Now, I think the Trump administration has now banned gain-of-function. 2:05:59 Is it really? 2:06:00 I mean, Obama, to his credit, Obama banned, had a moratorium on gain-of-function. 2:06:08 Probably it's just a completely ineffective ban, which Anthony Fauci just completely circumvented. 2:06:13 If you're already doing gain-of-function, keep going. 2:06:16 We set up this process to evaluate and never use the process. 2:06:21 They were absolutely doing gain-of-function research, which is why Fauci was denied in congressional hearings and just lied through his teeth. 2:06:28 But we need to look at that. 2:06:31 We need to look at why did they sabotage early treatment? 2:06:37 Here's why. 2:06:37 Let me read it. 2:06:39 This is the emergency use authorization of medical products published by 2:06:45 the Food and Drug Administration. 2:06:49 For FDA to issue an emergency use authorization, there must be no adequate, approved, and available alternative to the candidate product for diagnosing, preventing, or treating the disease or condition. 2:07:01 Again, I kept going, why aren't we doing early treatment? 2:07:05 Why was the NIH guideline, go home, don't do anything, maybe Tylenol? 2:07:12 Why were we spending hundreds of millions of dollars with an Operation Warp Speed on treatment? 2:07:16 I'd asked Francis Collins, very early on, I said, what are you doing in terms of exploring these cheap, generic drugs? 2:07:23 Because I'd held those hearings. 2:07:24 And he'd go, oh, Senator, we're spending hundreds of millions of dollars. 2:07:27 Well, prove it. 2:07:29 Send me the documentation. 2:07:32 Of course, I got no documentation. 2:07:35 I told the story last night. 2:07:36 I was working very early on with the CEO of Novartis. 2:07:40 a maker of hydroxychloroquine. 2:07:41 My concern, this was in March, after a state senator from Michigan went public and said, boy, I used hydroxychloroquine and I got cured of COVID. 2:07:51 Wow, is there a treatment? 2:07:52 So I was very excited about that. 2:07:53 So was President Trump. Speaker 1
2:07:54 Of course, that's what killed hydroxychloroquine. 2:07:56 President Trump suggested it. Speaker 5
2:07:59 But anyway, so I'm concerned at this point in time, if this is an effective treatment, can we produce enough? 2:08:04 So I'm on the phone with the CEO of Novartis, and he was all excited about it. 2:08:07 He said, yeah, we've got a bunch of trials. 2:08:09 We're going to be unveiling these things in mid-May, and hopefully they have great results. 2:08:15 And, yeah, we've got the manufacturing capability. 2:08:17 They'd already donated 30 million tablets to our national stockpile, but we weren't distributing them. 2:08:25 What was interesting about my connection with the CEO from Novartis about the end of April was, 2:08:30 He went radio silent. 2:08:31 I've never heard from him since. 2:08:33 So he's all excited. 2:08:34 So something happened. 2:08:37 You know, they, the powers to be, apparently decided there's not going to be early treatment here. 2:08:44 We've got operational speed. 2:08:47 We're going to use this mRNA platform. 2:08:50 We're going to call it something else. 2:08:53 By the way, I never really went through that analysis, did I, in terms of would this be a good time to do that? 2:09:01 September 2021, decision of CDC's, and by the way, and Merriam-Webster. 2:09:08 That's how powerful those people are. 2:09:11 You get Merriam-Webster to change the definition of a vaccine in the dictionary and went from a product that stimulates a person's immune system to produce immunity. 2:09:23 That means that you don't get sick. 2:09:25 to a specific disease, and they change it to a preparation that is used to stimulate the body's immune response against diseases. 2:09:34 So now all of a sudden, all they're doing with these mRNA is, well, does your antibody count grow up? 2:09:40 That's your body's immune response to it. 2:09:42 I guess you could actually, and by the way, doctors would say this, say, God, I got this really bad inflammation on my arm. 2:09:47 Well, it's showing it's working. 2:09:49 God, I really got, well, it's doing its job. 2:09:53 Unbelievable. 2:09:54 Let me finish this off by, here's the definition, which is why I call this, I go back and forth, you know, everybody calls it vaccine. 2:10:02 It always galls me when I make that mistake. 2:10:04 But here's the FDA's definition of gene therapy. 2:10:07 Quote, human gene therapy seeks to modify or manipulate the expression of a gene or to alter the biological properties of living cells for therapeutic use. 2:10:21 In my hearings, I kept asking these doctors, would you just explain in layman's terms what the mRNA does? 2:10:26 And I've now, as subcommittee chair, I've had a couple of Democrat witnesses, doctors, TV doctors, one head of an oncology society, come in and it's obvious they don't know what mRNA really does. 2:10:42 So let me, in my layman's terms, again, I'm not a doctor, but let me, as it was described to me by Dr. Michael Yeadon, this is not a bad term, 2:10:50 point to talk about him. 2:10:53 Fortunately, because I was advocating for early treatment, that type of thing, I got connected to Dr. Michael Yeadon in 2020, late 2020. 2:11:02 Dr. Michael Yeadon worked for Pfizer for 30-some years. 2:11:07 In the end, he ended up as a senior executive vice president. 2:11:14 His background of research, his background is in toxicology. 2:11:18 He left Pfizer and actually was doing joint ventures with his own biological company. 2:11:25 But he was literally beside himself when he heard what his colleagues were doing in terms of devising this gene therapy. 2:11:33 He said, Ron, there is a long list of ingredients. 2:11:38 We do not put in injectables because they're toxic to the body. 2:11:43 So when I heard my colleagues were going to devise a shot of 2:11:49 This is going to turn your cells into a manufacturing site for a spike protein that's toxic to it. 2:11:56 There's no way that's happening. 2:11:57 There's no way. 2:12:02 But that's exactly what they did. 2:12:04 So what the mRNA is, it's not true mRNA. 2:12:07 That's the first thing these doctors had testified before my committee get wrong. 2:12:10 I said, do you think, is this like regular mRNA that degrades very rapidly within hours or days? 2:12:15 Yeah. 2:12:16 No, it's not. 2:12:16 It's modified with pseudouridine to make it not degrade. 2:12:22 And we've actually got, I think I've got this. 2:12:32 The 2:12:34 mRNA in these injections. 2:12:36 It doesn't degrade. 2:12:37 It's, again, modified with methyl pseuduredine. 2:12:42 The Yale University LISN study says the spike protein from injection has been detected 29 to 709 days post-vaccination. 2:12:52 That's why I recommend, you know, get biopsies on tumors. 2:12:54 Studies show 2:12:56 The mRNA in blood plasma, 14 to 18 days. 2:13:00 In tissues and lymph nodes, 30 to 60 days. 2:13:03 Some studies, one to three years in exosomes and biopsies. 2:13:09 Okay? 2:13:10 So that's what this is. 2:13:13 A vaccine is either a live virus or an attenuated or a dead virus. 2:13:18 By the way, it doesn't excite your immune system well enough, so they have to add adjuvants like mercury and like aluminum. 2:13:25 to excite your immune system to react to that particular dead virus or attenuated virus. 2:13:31 This is something else. 2:13:32 This literally has encapsulated lipid nanoparticles, which now there's another study coming out showing how toxic just the lipid nanoparticle is. 2:13:41 And then you've got the mRNA, which enters the cell, turns it into a manufacturing site for the spike protein, which, again, the body recognizes is not of itself, and so the body attacks it. 2:13:53 And when the body attacks something in itself, that's called inflammation. 2:13:57 That's what myocarditis is. Speaker 2
2:13:59 Senator, I just want to make sure that the panel understands what you're saying. 2:14:03 So a normal vaccine, you know, pre-COVID, let's say for a virus, they would put pieces of a dead virus and eject it into us. 2:14:12 And our immune system, the theory is, is then would identify it as foreign and create antibodies. 2:14:18 So we're kind of primed if we run across that. 2:14:20 But what you're speaking about is this is actually a genetic modification. 2:14:26 So mRNA just stands for, you know, modified RNA. 2:14:32 So this goes into our cells and causes our own cells to manufacture the spike protein. 2:14:41 But the spike protein is the toxic part of COVID. 2:14:44 So I could call it a poison and I wouldn't be wrong. 2:14:48 So our body is basically these shots make our body manufacture a poison. 2:14:55 Is there an off switch to this? 2:14:57 Because it's actually our own cells that now are modified genetically to be permanently manufacturing a poison. 2:15:06 Is there an off switch? 2:15:08 to our bodies to stop manufacturing this poison that then creates immune response amongst others. Speaker 5
2:15:13 We don't know, but again, they found the actual spike protein up to 700 days. 2:15:18 They just didn't study it further. 2:15:20 So two of the major lies that they told about the injection is first of all, is the lipid nanoparticle or the injection would stay in the arm, right? 2:15:29 But the lipid nanoparticle is designed to permeate difficult permeate barriers, like the blood brain, like the placenta barrier. 2:15:36 And by the way, they knew that. 2:15:38 They had a study in rats that the Japanese regulators FOIAed and got this study by distributing it all over the body and, you know, accumulated in the adrenal glands, in the ovaries, that type. 2:15:49 So, again, they said it was going to stay in the arm. 2:15:52 They knew that. 2:15:54 This is going to be biodistributed all over the place. 2:15:56 And the other lie was that this, you know, it's mRNA. 2:15:58 No, it's modified RNA. 2:16:01 It's modified not to degrade. 2:16:04 And so, yeah, so again, these studies, again, we haven't done even close to the number of studies we should do because they don't want to know. 2:16:09 Again, government funds so much of this research. 2:16:14 When government does something, they don't want to fund a study that proves what they did is killing people. 2:16:20 So we just don't have the information. 2:16:22 That's what I'm saying. 2:16:22 We're asking a lot more questions than we can really provide answers to. Speaker 9
2:16:29 Mr. Folker. 2:16:32 Thank you, MP Ellison and Mr. Buckley, for the work that you've put into this inquiry. 2:16:36 I think it's important that Canadians have an opportunity to share their experiences of COVID and the injection injuries that they may have experienced as a result of that. 2:16:48 I want to thank Senator Johnson for being here this morning and for your testimony and the insight that you provided to the inquiry. 2:16:53 It's been very, very informative and very interesting. 2:16:57 You know, I get asked almost on a weekly basis as to the accountability that there will be for officials as to the information that they spread during COVID. 2:17:10 In particular, the Prime Minister and his Health Minister on a daily basis 2:17:15 were telling individuals, telling Canadians that they needed to get vaccinated with this COVID shot. 2:17:24 And you talked a little bit about the information that people like Dr. Fauci and others were spewing in the United States, but here also we heard a progression of stories from our officials, including provincial health officials that bought into 2:17:45 whatever information they were receiving. 2:17:47 But it started off very simple, get the injection and you won't get COVID. 2:17:51 They found out that that didn't work. 2:17:53 So then they said, well, get the injection, at least you won't spread it. 2:17:57 Well, that didn't work. 2:17:58 And then it changed, well, get the injection, you won't end up in hospital. 2:18:02 Well, that didn't work. 2:18:03 Well, get the injection, at least you won't end up in ICU on a ventilator. 2:18:07 Well, that didn't work. 2:18:08 And then they said, well, at least get the injection so you don't die. 2:18:12 That didn't work neither. 2:18:14 So one of the questions that people in my riding have been asking me, my constituents, is what kind of accountability will there be for individuals that told us to do something that they knew wasn't true? 2:18:28 That's that's number one. 2:18:29 The second question that they have and lots of them experience ongoing symptoms and. 2:18:39 illnesses that they believe are caused by their injection injury. 2:18:46 They're failing to get recognized by their medical practitioners. 2:18:52 And that's a frustration. 2:18:53 This is an opportunity for them to share that. 2:18:56 But they're asking, is there hope for me? 2:18:58 A lot of them are experiencing neurological systems where they have skin irritations and an inability to function. 2:19:06 Can you answer the first question first about accountability, what in the United States, if there's going to be any, what you perceive could be here in Canada, but also can you give some of these injection injured folks hope as to is there solutions for me going forward? 2:19:22 Is there some kind of protocols that are apparently working? 2:19:28 And we know from the time when our health officials were giving us information, as you stated in your comments, they demonized treatments like ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine to the point where they mocked people that even thought about it or considered using it. 2:19:47 And today we know that there seems to have been some effectiveness in those treatments. Speaker 5
2:19:52 So in terms of accountability, I get the same thing. 2:19:56 When are people going to go to jail? 2:19:59 First of all, that's going to be difficult. 2:20:03 The federal government in the U.S., at least, is almost impossible to sue. 2:20:06 The agents of the federal government are kind of protected that same way. 2:20:09 And, again, these people aren't stupid. 2:20:13 They hide their crime. 2:20:15 We've seen instance after instance. 2:20:18 The most famous one now is Dr. David Morins, a key aide to Fauci, who, by the way, he tried to distance us from. 2:20:25 His email, I've got this FOIA lady showing me how to make emails disappear. 2:20:29 So there is a very broad knowledge within these agencies that FOIA is there and be very careful what you put in writing. 2:20:41 So they don't. 2:20:42 You see it time and time again. 2:20:43 Well, don't put this in an email. 2:20:44 Send it to my Gmail account. 2:20:47 Let's meet on this, okay? 2:20:50 So getting the evidence to convict would be difficult. 2:20:53 But from a standpoint of accountability, from my own standpoint, the first and the most important part of accountability is exposure. 2:21:02 I don't want Fauci to go down in history as St. Fauci, the savior. 2:21:06 No, I want him to go down as one of the most infamous villains ever. 2:21:10 Certainly in U.S. history. 2:21:12 OK, the guy's a monster. 2:21:15 Read Bobby Kennedy's book. 2:21:16 So, again, I think we've come a long way that way. 2:21:19 I mean, the day in front of Homeland Security Committee, when he took the fifth, that was a very bad day for Anthony Fauci. 2:21:27 The revelation of these diaries, now his text messages, emails, we get more, you know, we're exposing the truth. 2:21:33 And these people are going to be held accountable. 2:21:34 Now, you know, government officials in Canada, I mean, I don't want to give them advice, but I guess I will. 2:21:40 I was just listening to Fauci. 2:21:43 I was believing what Peter Marks said. 2:21:45 And that will be a viable defense. 2:21:48 But what's indefensible is how they treated, for example, the truckers. 2:21:53 Okay? 2:21:54 Quite honestly, how they're using MAID to put people out of their misery as opposed to, can we try and treat them? 2:22:03 In terms of hope for people, this increase hope. 2:22:08 You can argue, well, boy, this should have been happening within months. 2:22:13 But at least it's happening now. 2:22:15 I said the suicide rates of COVID-19 groups are increasing because they're getting despondent. 2:22:23 In America, they don't even have an ICD code, which is what doctors use to bill for providing particular service. 2:22:28 Now, talking to HHS, it's, again, a bureaucratic nightmare. 2:22:32 It sounds like they'll get their ICD codes so doctors can start billing for it, which is kind of the first step in acknowledging these things are real. 2:22:42 But, again, this inquiry itself is probably the best hope they have right now because until federal health agencies, until the medical establishment, until doctors acknowledge these things are real, they're not going to start practicing medicine. 2:22:57 And, again, I'm in connection with the injection injured, and they're trying all kinds of things. 2:23:05 They're trying a lot of things. 2:23:08 Some work, some don't. 2:23:10 I know Dr. Peter McCulloch, he'll talk about spike detox. 2:23:15 So, again, I'm not a doctor. 2:23:18 I hope there's hope. 2:23:20 But what I do know is Dr. Nath, when he was treating these people in March of 2020, knew that early intervention, which means early acknowledgement, is crucial in some of these people who have been suffering for five years. 2:23:32 So it might be a more difficult task. Speaker 6
2:23:41 Thank you, MP Allison. 2:23:44 Just on this line of questioning, I'm curious because we have not heard the word Dr. Theresa Tam brought up yet, or at least I haven't. 2:23:55 And I know that she, well, she was quite frankly on all of our televisions during COVID, just like Dr. Fauci was on American televisions. 2:24:04 I'm just curious. 2:24:05 What was there? 2:24:08 Are you aware of any conversation between Dr. Carissa Tam, Dr. Fauci, the collaboration of such or was there no collaboration of such? 2:24:18 Be very curious to hear if in and through any of your. 2:24:22 witness testimonial or studies, I would be, I think it's important to this conversation, if you could expand on any of that, please. Speaker 5
2:24:32 So as much as I love Canada and Canadians, I got enough news from Washington, America, so I've not heard of Dr. Tam. 2:24:39 I may have, but the name didn't register. 2:24:41 What I will do is I'll have that as a search term with the emails and texts, and I'll see. 2:24:48 We'll check it out. 2:24:49 Okay. 2:24:50 And so my staff, PSI staff is listening right now. 2:24:54 Dial in Dr. Teresa Tam. 2:24:56 How do you pronounce that? 2:24:57 How do you spell it? 2:24:59 T-A-M. T-A-M. Dr. Teresa Tam. 2:25:05 We'll put that in. 2:25:06 We'll just see if there's any. 2:25:07 Please do. Speaker 6
2:25:07 I would be very, very curious to know. Speaker 5
2:25:09 Thank you. 2:25:10 I do know. 2:25:12 And I don't want to release anything, but we are finding... 2:25:20 There's a great deal of cooperation between Fauci and federal health officials and Chinese officials, which is interesting. 2:25:27 As we get more and more information, we'll start releasing that. 2:25:29 We kind of got to put the whole package together, but stay tuned on some of those things. Speaker 2
2:25:40 Senator, I'm wondering if you can speak to us about what's called Event 201, because I think it'll shock some people. 2:25:47 that really there was a dress rehearsal with shocking similarities shortly before COVID happened. Speaker 5
2:25:56 So first of all, I'll help dispel some myths. 2:25:59 The Trusted News Initiative didn't spring out of Event 201. 2:26:04 I kind of always thought it did until I've done some research on this. 2:26:06 The Trusted News Initiative, which was used to censor misinformation, disinformation, and the truth that they called malinformation, they actually sprang out of a... 2:26:18 BBC June 2019 Trusted News Summit. 2:26:22 And the Trusted News Initiative was launched on September 7th of 2019, whereas I think Event 201 was October. 2:26:31 Do you have the date on that? Speaker 2
2:26:35 Yes, I do. 2:26:36 Just hang on a second. 2:26:39 October 18th, 2019. Speaker 5
2:26:41 So what's eerie about Event 201 is they were talking about a coronavirus spring out of China. 2:26:48 They certainly implemented and talked about how we're going to have to button up the information that people are going to be hearing because there's going to be a lot of misinformation, a lot of disinformation. 2:26:59 We've got to hang together here and make sure that only the truth is disseminated. 2:27:05 There's nothing inherently wrong. 2:27:06 I mean, as chairman of Homeland Security, I was aware of them. 2:27:09 They had a blue ribbon panel on biologic issues. 2:27:12 threats, how to respond to them. 2:27:14 So, I mean, government responsibly should do that. 2:27:17 I'm not a fan of government, but that's one thing government ought to do. 2:27:21 If there's an attack using biologic agents or there's a pandemic, you want government to be able to respond. 2:27:29 Our problem is, you know, 2:27:32 they took the plants and threw them out the window and they listened to, to the science, you know, Dr. Fauci, who said masks weren't good effective. 2:27:39 Then all of a sudden they were going to be effective. 2:27:40 They need two or three of them. 2:27:42 The six, you know, again, they, they just scared the, you know, one out of people. 2:27:47 But no, event 201 is a very interesting, is sponsored by Johns Hopkins. 2:27:52 I think Bill and Melinda Gates foundation. 2:27:54 And I think Bill and Melinda, I think Bill Gates's fingerprints is all over these things. 2:28:00 I have not personally done an investigation, but I've certainly read reports of how he invested in BioNTech and cashed out of that. 2:28:08 He's obviously using his wealth to really have a great deal of influence and not control a lot of these world health organizations. 2:28:16 Big into mass vaccination. 2:28:17 I think he probably needs to be investigated and held to account as well. Speaker 2
2:28:26 You mentioned plants, and I think 2:28:29 I have a question of whether the U.S. did the same, but viral pandemics, it turns out, have been happening for ages. 2:28:37 And we've learned lessons from them. 2:28:39 And the federal government, the World Health Organization, and every province in Canada had a plan in place and an agency to enact that plan on how to treat with a viral pandemic. 2:28:53 And it appears that 2:28:55 We did everything opposite. 2:28:57 So every province abandoned their plan. 2:28:59 The federal government abandoned their plan and did the exact opposite of all the lessons learned in the past. 2:29:05 Was that the experience in the United States? 2:29:08 And did different states have plans also that then were abandoned? 2:29:11 And if that is the case, do you have any explanation as to, you know, why we would have plans from lessons learned? 2:29:18 It seems the whole world. 2:29:20 And we abandoned them for this pandemic. Speaker 5
2:29:24 Well, what was generally true in America is states that were governed by liberal progressive governments, you know, we'd call them blue states, Democrat states, they generally kind of, they like government, they like using government power, and so they seized it, and they, by and large, generally went overboard, whereas red states, Republican-run states, maintained greater freedom, okay? 2:29:46 Okay. 2:29:47 You know, President Trump pretty well left up the states. 2:29:49 He didn't want to impose federal. 2:29:51 He didn't impose federal mandates. 2:29:52 He just kind of left up the states. 2:29:55 I think where you really saw an abandonment of common sense. 2:29:59 And this this is where, again, as much as I am thankful and admire and revere doctors for saving my daughter's life and doing so many wonderful things for so many people yesterday and today and tomorrow. 2:30:14 profoundly disappointed and saddened about the medical establishment in America, and particularly hospital protocols. 2:30:21 We're going to be holding an event, not going to do a hearing because we really don't want the minority mucking it up. 2:30:33 I want to be able to hear from these people, but families, doctors, nurses that witness the protocols, the victims. 2:30:41 And one of the witnesses will be 2:30:44 Attorney Ralph Larigio, and these are approximate numbers, but he started advocating for families whose loved ones are in the hospitals, on the protocols, just begging, I mean, they're dying. 2:30:56 How about give this a shot? 2:30:59 Would you try the hydroxychloroquine protocol, the FLCC protocol? 2:31:04 Would you try ivermectin? 2:31:06 Nope, nope, nope. 2:31:07 So Ralph Larigio's an attorney that went and started suing these hospitals. 2:31:11 And again, approximate numbers of the 200 cases he represented families in, he won about 70 of them. 2:31:19 And where he won them and the people who were administered the drugs, only three people died. 2:31:26 Of the approximately 120 that he lost or couldn't get into court in time and they stayed on the hospital protocols, they all died. 2:31:35 I know that's not a random controlled trial, but that's pretty strong observational evidence that 2:31:41 These things worked. 2:31:42 But in reviewing the testimony, let me just read the common themes in terms of hospital protocols. 2:31:51 Ivermectin was refused. 2:31:53 Ivermectin was withdrawn. 2:31:55 It was working successfully. 2:31:57 It was withdrawn. 2:31:58 It was a hospital protocol, and their progress was reversed, and people died. 2:32:05 Early and inappropriate innovation. 2:32:08 And 2:32:10 Innovation without consent. 2:32:13 Remdesivir administered without consent. 2:32:15 I mean, there's so many people in the testimonies who had acute kidney injury. 2:32:23 On their charts, they do not administer remdesivir because we know it can knock out kidneys. 2:32:28 Got administered anyway. 2:32:30 And hospital administrators lied to people. 2:32:34 Both verbal and charted discrimination, blaming unvaccinated. 2:32:39 I can't, again, these are witnesses from all over the country. 2:32:41 I can't tell you how many report that a doctor or a nurse said, well, your dad's going to die. 2:32:47 What did you expect? 2:32:48 He's unvaccinated. 2:32:49 Hopefully you learned your lesson. 2:32:51 I mean, it's just time and time again, the same type of deal. 2:32:54 And I think a suspicion if you're unvaccinated, that they didn't go the extra mile to try and save that loved one. 2:33:02 Refusal, I'll just add this, refusal to treat bacterial pneumonia is 2:33:10 You know how to treat bacteria. 2:33:11 You use antibiotics. 2:33:12 They didn't use antibiotics. 2:33:13 They gave them remdesivir. 2:33:17 So again, I mean, time and time again, hospitals just, again, they were told, and understand why they do this. 2:33:24 This is the upside down nature of our medical establishment right now. 2:33:28 Doctors should be the top of the treatment pyramid, right? 2:33:31 They've got the primary responsibility patients. 2:33:33 They swear their Hippocratic oath. 2:33:36 Federal administrations ought to be at the bottom of 2:33:38 provide recommendations, but again, it's the doctor in consultation with the patient that ought to be making the decisions. 2:33:44 Right now, it's the doctors at the bottom. 2:33:46 They're being crushed by the dictates, by Mr. Science, like Fauci and these protocols, which then the hospitals, they pick up on them. 2:33:55 I mean, remdesivir is a highly profitable drug to administer. 2:34:00 You put somebody on a ventilator and you're going to be a really high billing for that individual. 2:34:06 But if you follow the protocol... 2:34:09 imposed on you by the federal government, you're pretty well home free in terms of liability protection as well. 2:34:14 You step outside that protocol when you've got, particularly when you've got the FDA saying ivermectin, come on, you're not a horse. 2:34:21 You've got Fauci publicly saying, well, there could be some real toxic issues with ivermectin. 2:34:28 It's kind of hard to blame the hospital ministry saying, I'm not going to touch that with a 10-foot pole. 2:34:32 If somebody dies, they'll blame ivermectin and we'll get sued out of business. 2:34:38 So, again, there are so many things that were going on here, but hospital protocols, again, we'll have that event on the 28th. 2:34:46 You're going to hear just heartbreaking, heart-wrenching testimony. Speaker 6
2:34:52 Senator, I'm just going to go back to my original, to my opening remarks, because I would be remiss if I only spoke about myself as a political baby, but what I didn't speak about is... 2:35:08 My daughter who started University of Guelph and about two weeks into it was basically locked down into her dorm and ended up crying and coming home. 2:35:25 And she's one of many. 2:35:27 And that was her first year of university. 2:35:29 University of Guelph, ironically, to be a veterinarian. 2:35:33 So when you talk about ivermectin, I got five horses at home. 2:35:36 I know all what you're talking about. 2:35:39 I also didn't talk about my five-year-old grandson. 2:35:42 I heard you are a grandfather. 2:35:44 And once you're a grandparent, there's very little better in the world. 2:35:48 And I think about my five-year-old grandson who basically lost two wildly important years of his life. 2:35:59 Wildly important. 2:36:00 Some of the most important years of his life because he's an only child and he wasn't allowed to play with any friends. 2:36:08 And so I bring that up, Senator, because although we're talking about all the side effects, and I know I spoke about my mother this morning, what we have not been talking about yet, we haven't spoke about yet, is the mental illness side of what COVID did to society for not one year, but close to two and a half years. 2:36:31 And so I think about myself and my responsibility 2:36:36 as a lawmaker, yourself as a lawmaker, great folks around here as lawmakers. 2:36:40 And I respect you immensely when you talk about get government out of the way and let people live their lives, however, and definitely respect our doctors. 2:36:48 There's no doubt about it. 2:36:50 But is there, I guess it really goes down to the question of, one last comment before the question. 2:36:55 I really don't believe, to save my soul, 2:37:00 That if the government came out right now, at least in my region, and said, there's COVID, go home. 2:37:06 Put a mask on and get the shot. 2:37:08 I strongly, strongly do not believe there would be people lining up, getting ready to wear the shot or getting the mask or staying home. 2:37:18 Which is why I believe this is somewhat generational. 2:37:21 Because I'm not even so sure in my lifetime, and I just turned 50, I'm not so sure that I'm going to see anybody really complying by the law. 2:37:29 But then I go back to my grandson, who's five years old, who doesn't understand it. 2:37:34 He lived through it, but doesn't get it. 2:37:36 So my question is, is there anything as lawmakers we should be working on doing today to ensure that future generations, I don't even know what it looks like, but it hit me. 2:37:52 Anything we should be putting into law to ensure that we don't go through this again, full well knowing there's going to be viruses that come along. 2:37:58 There's going to be various things, but I'm just trying to think about the mental health side. 2:38:04 Sorry for blabbering on, but that's just where my heart is right now, Senator, if you could expand on. Speaker 5
2:38:10 Again, first step is exposing this so people are aware of it. 2:38:14 If you want to do something legislatively, I think you need to dramatically reduce the power that we've given 2:38:20 government to control our lives in these situations. 2:38:23 Now, again, the world's going the opposite direction. 2:38:26 Now, we, America, you know, dodged a bullet under the Biden administration, signing on to the WHO's 2:38:34 I can't remember exactly what the thing's called, but, I mean, there's a new treaty that's going to really give the WHO all of the power to impose on everybody else. 2:38:41 And we dodged that bullet for the time being, but they'll try and do it again. 2:38:45 So don't allow a World Health Organization to gain power over your sovereignty. 2:38:52 And, by the way, I agree with grandkids. 2:38:54 It's all the joy, very little responsibility. 2:38:58 Grandchildren are our parents' revenge on their children. 2:39:00 It's hard raising a kid. 2:39:04 It was really hard during COVID. 2:39:06 And as I said in my opening statement, you know, the teachers, they could take the time off. 2:39:11 They lobbied hard so they didn't have to do their job. 2:39:17 And, of course, when Sweden didn't lock down schools, remember how Sweden was excoriated? 2:39:22 How they were ridiculed and vilified? 2:39:26 They had far greater success on COVID than America did. 2:39:32 And again, the psychological harm, I mean, listen, fear is an incredibly powerful motivator. 2:39:38 And those government officials that wielded fear to gain that power, I mean, that was the whole purpose of my May 2020 hearing with John Eden. 2:39:48 You know, don't be afraid. 2:39:50 I mean, be aware. 2:39:52 If you're elderly, if you have certain comorbidities, yeah, this could be deadly. 2:39:56 Take precautions. 2:39:57 If you have an experimental gene therapy vaccination, fine, they'll offer it to the vulnerable. 2:40:03 But give them the full information. 2:40:05 Make sure that Pfizer doesn't lie about their studies. 2:40:10 So, again, that's why you need a covert reckoning. 2:40:12 You've got to take a look at all the bad decisions made. 2:40:15 If you're going to pass legislation, make sure that you don't give them the power to make those same types of bad decisions in the future. 2:40:23 Okay? Speaker 1
2:40:28 Senator, I got a question for you regarding docs. 2:40:31 I mean, we, utmost respect for docs. 2:40:33 And I think some of the challenges, and you alluded to this in the beginning, was, you know, in Canada, the College of Physicians and Surgeons in every province operates differently, but sort of the same. 2:40:44 And a tremendous amount of pressures on our docs. 2:40:47 A lot of docs that actually raised concerns. 2:40:50 Some of them had their licenses stripped. 2:40:53 Some were threatened. 2:40:54 Some had to fight for their life to keep them, even today. 2:40:57 You know, we've got a number of docs that are concerned and want to raise issues. 2:41:01 And it could be on anything. 2:41:02 But we're talking about this COVID-19. 2:41:06 So any thoughts, you know, anecdotally or what you heard through some of your testimonies? 2:41:12 I mean, there's one thing for government to imply or, you know, implement certain things or have rules. 2:41:20 But I think we've got these quasi, you know, governmental bodies that aren't necessarily accountable to anybody. 2:41:27 And which was a bit of the workaround for how these things were dealt with. 2:41:31 I mean, in my opening statement, I talked with Dr. Havu. 2:41:34 Actually, you know, the reporting seemed to be taken away from this voluntary mayors here in Canada and put with each of the provinces. 2:41:42 And then the provinces decided what they would accept in terms of vaccine injured. 2:41:48 But more importantly, when doctors raised these issues, they were silenced and threatened. 2:41:53 And you think of someone that spends, you know, 12 years of their life 2:41:56 trying to become a doc and all of a sudden the thought of having their income and their livelihood destroyed overnight, you know, what, what is it we can do? 2:42:04 You know, what, what do we do with a college of physician surgeons, which clearly is without, you know, with any scope of government. 2:42:12 Yeah. 2:42:12 The, the, the doctor associations are a problem. Speaker 5
2:42:15 But, and one thing I will definitely mention in our hospital protocol event is getting everybody to remember the, 2:42:24 unbelievably courageous doctors and nurses that were flooding into new york city and some of these hot spots and you know new yorkers banging pots and pans at the end of the shift you know thanking those doctors and nurses because again we're all you know we're all freaking out we don't we don't again we don't know is this sars is this mers is this you know we don't know and yet you have doctors and nurses who are who are treating those those people so again i i 2:42:49 Go back to, I've got reverence. 2:42:50 I've got deep appreciation for members of the community. 2:42:53 And I've got a great deal of sympathy because the doctors that had that extra courage and compassion to treat and publicly admit it and insist that the pharmacists filled their prescriptions of ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine. 2:43:08 Again, if they didn't have their license pulled, they had their careers destroyed. 2:43:12 McCulloch got sued, fired. 2:43:16 So it doesn't take a dictator... 2:43:20 too many people to hang something in the public square to get everybody in line, right? 2:43:24 And so these doctors like McCulloch and Corey and these other people that did the treatment, they were made examples of and people paid attention to it. 2:43:33 Again, I've got to agree to you simply because it's a lot of work, time and effort to become a doctor or a nurse. 2:43:40 And most doctors and nurses are doing it because they want to heal people. 2:43:43 They want to continue to heal people. 2:43:45 They want to continue their profession. 2:43:47 And they saw by the – again, the power being wielded by these bureaucrats, that that was being threatened. 2:43:56 So I think just kind of recognizing that fact and in some way shield them. 2:44:03 Again, I think some of these – 2:44:07 You need to expose, you know, where some of these doctor associations are, how they're getting reimbursed, you know, the money they make, and maybe reform some of those things. 2:44:18 Again, you got to follow the money. 2:44:21 But again, I've just got, God bless the doctors and nurses who did it. 2:44:27 And I completely understand. 2:44:28 I mean, I'll get doctors, I mean, anecdotally coming up, you know, and I have no other doctors, as you know, talking earlier, you know, to come up and say, you know, 2:44:37 Thanks for getting out there. 2:44:38 Thanks for doing that. 2:44:39 And I do not harbor any ill will toward any of them by them not becoming a Pierre Corey or Dr. McCullough. 2:44:47 I keep using those two. 2:44:48 There's a bunch of others. 2:44:51 But, again, it gets right back to how important events like this are so the public can hear. 2:44:59 Again, COVID-19, a second opinion. 2:45:03 I'm not saying I'm right about everything. 2:45:04 Again, there's just more questions I have than absolute answers. 2:45:09 But we need to be able to ask those questions. 2:45:11 And doctors should have been allowed to practice medicine. 2:45:14 They weren't. 2:45:15 They weren't. 2:45:18 Mr. Dawson. Speaker 8
2:45:21 Thank you, Dean. 2:45:23 We've heard Fauci's name. 2:45:24 We've heard Dr. Tam's name. 2:45:27 What role did the WHO play? 2:45:29 We've heard it a minute ago, but maybe I missed it earlier. 2:45:32 But what role did the WHO play in, I don't know, with each country, U.S., Canada, and other countries on how the doctors, Dr. Fauci and Dr. Tam listened to the World Health Organization and whether it was good or bad with what the World Health Organization was portraying to the rest of the countries? Speaker 5
2:45:57 So I'm not sure they played much role at all. 2:45:59 I appreciate the fact that in December 2020, they recommended against the use of remdesivir. 2:46:05 Appreciate that. 2:46:06 I think they certainly helped cover up the origin. 2:46:11 They were probably complicit in that. 2:46:13 Other than that, I mean, you know, the main culpability here, the main culpability really has to fall on, you know, 2:46:23 Elected officeholders, that type of thing that, again, you used fear. 2:46:28 Again, if you're doing a COVID reckoning, I think you really need to take a look at what were the things that people were. 2:46:36 Biden's chief of staff, Jeffrey Seitz, this is going to be a winner of death if you don't get vaccinated. 2:46:42 I didn't get vaccinated. 2:46:44 I didn't die. 2:46:46 I know a lot of people didn't get vaccinated, didn't die. 2:46:50 And it's, you know, one of the things we should talk about, too, is the stratification of the risk. 2:46:55 I don't deny if you're an elderly person that COVID was... 2:46:58 I was doing telephone town halls warning my constituents, you know, take this seriously. 2:47:02 I mean, I know it's kind of become partisan. 2:47:04 You kind of blow it off your Republican, your Democrat, you're masked up and stuff. 2:47:08 Talk about the psychological harm. 2:47:09 I'm still seeing people wear masks in their cars. 2:47:13 Now, some of those people have illnesses and, you know, I've actually appreciated the Japanese culture. 2:47:17 When they have a cold, they wear a mask. 2:47:18 I mean, so... 2:47:20 But we've done so we've done so much harm psychologically from that standpoint. 2:47:26 But I started talking about Sweden, you know, how much how much better they did than we did. 2:47:32 And I think you really need to analyze, you know, which were the elected officials who pushed the fear to gain control. 2:47:42 OK, let me tell you what the governor of New York did, Cuomo. 2:47:47 shunned all the elderly into nursing homes. 2:47:52 It's like the worst possible thing you could do. 2:47:55 So again, there are just so many mistakes made. 2:47:57 I mean, we don't have enough time to go through them all. Speaker 2
2:48:03 So can I follow up? 2:48:05 Because there hasn't really been a discussion yet on the danger posed to different age groups. 2:48:11 So it does seem clear, just like a regular flu, it's elderly or people with 2:48:18 you know, health issues already that are at risk. 2:48:21 Can you speak to, in your investigations, for example, we started vaccinating children at six months and we're still doing that in Canada. 2:48:29 The vaccine is approved for use in Canada, the COVID-19 vaccines, from six months of age. 2:48:35 In other countries, there's a list of countries that don't allow vaccine for 18 years of age and under. 2:48:43 Were our children at risk or did the vaccine put them at risk? 2:48:46 And can you speak to the other age groups? Speaker 5
2:48:49 So I think it's just without dispute that children had almost a zero risk of serious side effects. 2:48:56 And let's say there are certain comorbidities. 2:48:58 OK, but I mean, a healthy child virtually had no risk of serious injury or death of COVID. 2:49:07 And yet, because they wanted this universal mRNA platform just introduced and become just part of daily life, again, it was unconscionable that they force this on teenagers, particularly when they knew already by May they were admitting. 2:49:24 It's one of the side effects of admitting myocarditis, particularly in young men, and they still recommended its use. 2:49:30 So, I mean, that's one of the things they absolutely need to be held accountable for. 2:49:34 But, yeah, I mean, there's generally age stratification. 2:49:38 I mean, elderly are generally more vulnerable to just about anything. 2:49:40 And that is certainly true in this case. 2:49:43 What was kind of unusual, I think, about COVID is children were almost without risk, and yet they still had this injected. 2:49:50 So, I mean, one of our oversights is, you know, Vinay Prasad issued a memo, leaked, and followed up on the 10 child deaths where they had autopsies that the CDC, FDA said, you know, probably were caused by the vaccine. 2:50:06 And they're still covering that up. 2:50:09 The people who issued those memos, I mean, they've rewritten the memos to soften it. 2:50:13 Now I'm hearing there's three additional child deaths. 2:50:16 But can you imagine being a parent who listened to these people lie? 2:50:22 Bought the lies and did what they thought was doing right. 2:50:26 I mean, I don't want to see the grandparent die. 2:50:30 OK, even though, you know, the Pfizer employees realize we never tested for transmissibility. 2:50:38 We were flying the plane as we were building it. 2:50:41 Those are quotes, okay? 2:50:43 Can you imagine being one of those parents and you get your kid injected and your child doesn't wake up? 2:50:51 That's not hypothetical. 2:50:52 It happened. 2:50:55 It happened. 2:50:58 And that's why these officials have to be held accountable for this stuff. 2:51:02 Again, that's why they'll never admit they're wrong. 2:51:06 But internally, they are. 2:51:07 I mean, again, they're admitting internally they got the they got the autopsies. 2:51:10 Yeah, this that child died because he got a vaccine. 2:51:15 Pretty much indisputable. 2:51:16 By the way, that's just the tip of the iceberg because there weren't there weren't many autopsies done. Speaker 2
2:51:22 I think you're you're on a very important point. 2:51:24 And I just I want to stay there for a little bit is is my understanding. 2:51:29 And you're saying it yourself is that children really were at zero risk. 2:51:33 I mean, anywhere in the world. 2:51:35 a healthy child did not have any risk of dying of COVID. 2:51:39 And yet we're basically forcing vaccination on children of something that can only be described as experimental. 2:51:46 I mean, you didn't even need to read any papers or the clinical trial evidence to know there won't be much evidence there because it was rushed. 2:51:57 Didn't exist before. 2:51:59 The mean reporting time was two months. 2:52:02 So we're basically forcing the treatment 2:52:06 on a novel platform on children that we've really only tested for a mean of two months. 2:52:11 We can't know the short-term effects, let alone the medium-term effects, let alone the long-term effects. 2:52:16 Like, how could you predict what the effect's going to be on an entire generation of our children? 2:52:22 And there was zero risk. 2:52:24 And on your point that they can't do accountability, what do parents do? 2:52:30 Because just in my circle, I know a lot of children that were seriously harmed 2:52:36 you know, myocarditis and other things. 2:52:40 And I don't know if I'm a parent and I'm the one that made the decision to get my child vaccinated. 2:52:47 And then later on, I learned, wait a second, they knew they weren't at any risk. 2:52:52 And yet we're forced to do this. 2:52:53 Like, how do you kind of even get there as a parent? 2:52:57 I'm wondering if part of the reluctance for society to accept what we've done 2:53:03 is that people in decision-making authority, including parents, would then have to admit that they've done something harmful. Speaker 5
2:53:11 First of all, understand their main sales pitch for the injection. 2:53:16 It was 95% effective. 2:53:18 Sounds really good, doesn't it? 2:53:20 So you first have to understand risk-benefit and the difference between relative risk and absolute risk. 2:53:28 So let me, as an analogy, I'm not saying these are absolute numbers, but let's take, for example, 2:53:34 If the absolute risk of you dying from something is 0.1%, and you have a 90% reduction in that risk, sounds really good. 2:53:43 Well, now you're 0.01. 2:53:44 It's a 90% reduction, but again, your absolute risk is virtually nil. 2:53:51 But for example, with the flu vaccine, again, these are numbers published by the manufacturer, Moderna. 2:53:56 The standard flu vaccine has a 2.6% rate of serious adverse events. 2:54:01 Now, what is a serious adverse event? 2:54:04 Death, a condition that will result in immediate death, permanent disability, or birth defect. 2:54:12 And then there's also a more generalized category in terms of extent of hospital care, medical intervention, that type of thing. 2:54:18 Again, serious stuff, 2.6%. 2:54:23 For, again, if you're a young person, you're probably not going to die of flu. 2:54:26 Do you really want to subject yourself to almost a 3% risk? 2:54:31 getting a serious adverse event, again, the cost-benefit ratio, the risk-benefit ratio is just totally whacked as it was with the injection for children. 2:54:41 Now, what they just did with Moderna, because they want to push this mRNA because it is profitable, 2:54:47 You can rapidly react to whatever pathogen you're looking for. 2:54:50 You know, the flu vaccines, they're always guessing, you know, what's the strain that we're trying to vaccinate against? 2:54:56 So I understand the appeal for mRNA, but I also understand the risk. 2:55:00 So now Moderna comes out with a new flu vaccine, the risk of serious adverse events is 2.7%. 2:55:06 So it's approved to flying colors. 2:55:13 Because, again, it's like comparing hemlock to arsenic, right? 2:55:20 So they're equally safe, equally dangerous. 2:55:23 But, again, parents have to – we're all going to have to take a look at the absolute risk of getting the disease, having a serious impact from the disease, and – 2:55:36 the absolute risk of the intervention. 2:55:39 And by the way, recommend to all your audience, Adam's series book, Vaccines Amen. 2:55:47 You take a look at some of these videos, the Brady's bunch, they're all laughing about that. 2:55:51 Oh, they all got measles. 2:55:53 When did measles all of a sudden become an absolute deadly disease? 2:55:59 In the Aaron series book on page 84, he's got a chart. 2:56:04 It shows the number of deaths of all these infectious childhood diseases the year before the vaccine was available. 2:56:12 We keep hearing millions of lives saved by these vaccines. 2:56:16 But if you total up all the deaths of all those childhood diseases that occurred in a year before the vaccine, it's less than 5,000. 2:56:27 I'm not saying people don't die of these things, but we've got antibiotics now. 2:56:31 Medicine has advanced since the Spanish flu. 2:56:35 But it's become a religion, the vaccinology, and vaccinologists simply do not admit ever that their vaccines might actually have a negative impact. 2:56:48 They always ignore the risk and overstate the benefit. 2:56:52 And people need to understand that. 2:56:54 Can I ask myself my own question here? 2:56:56 Because we're talking, you know, you got to understand the lies we've been told and how they use the experts. 2:57:03 So in one of our hearings, I think this is the one where my ranking member went out. 2:57:08 This might have been Voice of the Vaccine Injury, where my ranking member went out and did a press conference about an hour before the hearing. 2:57:15 And, again, these are parents of children who are either autistic. 2:57:20 They became autistic very rapidly after a vaccine or died of SIDS or whatever. 2:57:28 They're telling true stories, okay? 2:57:31 The ranking member goes out to the media and says, don't pay attention to this hearing. 2:57:34 It's not credible. 2:57:36 It's not worth your attention, okay? 2:57:40 But in that hearing, he trotted out the Commonwealth Fund study on the COVID vaccine and how, I've got it right here. 2:57:54 This is a study, it was conducted by, I won't name their names, 2:58:00 but a faculty for the Center of Vaccine Development, University of Maryland, professor of applied mathematics and computational epidemiology at York University, a research scientist in epidemiology at Yale School of Public Health, and the founding director of Yale Center for Infectious Diseases. 2:58:17 Now, these are heavy hitters, right? 2:58:18 These are learned members from academia. 2:58:22 They claimed from their study, doing their mathematics, all their research, 2:58:27 complex that the COVID injection saved 3.2 million lives in 2021 and 2022. 2:58:35 So I'm chairman of the committee. 2:58:39 I'm listening to, again, my ranking member denigrate the hearing, denigrate my witnesses, and he trots out that study. 2:58:46 So I put together three slides to show what rubbish the study is. 2:58:53 So the first slide is up here right now. 2:58:56 The solid blue, those are actual deaths per year dating back to 2020. 2:59:03 2010, I'm sorry. 2:59:05 So up through 2019, you see the compounded annual growth rate. 2:59:10 These are deaths in the United States, total mortality in the United States. 2:59:13 They're rising slowly by a little less than 1% a year to about 2.9 million people dying the year before the pandemic. 2:59:21 Okay? 2:59:23 Now, if it will continue to go, 2:59:25 You know, 1% growth, that's the Hatchmark chart just shows you what deaths would have been. 2:59:33 Next chart shows actual deaths. 2:59:36 So you can see in 2020, increased by half a million deaths. 2:59:40 Something obviously happened. 2:59:43 You know, there was a coronavirus. 2:59:45 And some people denied. 2:59:46 I mean, I think there was, okay? 2:59:48 I don't know how many of those deaths were really associated to that with just the way we shut down hospitals, we didn't diagnose cancers. 2:59:53 I mean, there's all kinds of things happening in 2020 that produced a half a million more deaths in the U.S. 3:00:00 So you assume in 2021, once we start the mass vaccination campaign, if it worked, the deaths would have actually declined. 3:00:10 But they didn't. 3:00:10 They increased to 3.4 million. 3:00:13 And still we're above that normalized line in 2021 or in 2022. 3:00:20 So again, how do you get 3.2 million lives saved for the actual results? 3:00:27 Well, here's how they do it. 3:00:29 You'd have to assume they were going to go from 2.9 million deaths in 2019, the year of the pandemic without a vaccine, 3:00:39 where, I hate to use the word, we called the herd. 3:00:41 I mean, the most vulnerable people died in 2020, right? 3:00:47 You'd have to assume we were going to go from 2.9 to 3.4 to 5 million deaths in both 2021 and 2022 to come up with, you say, 3.2 million lives. 3:00:57 Now, again, I'm not a mathematician. 3:01:01 I'm in a column I can do. 3:01:02 There is no way, based on the actual data, 3:01:08 But yet you've got experts, credentialed experts, publishing a rubbish study like this that then a U.S. senator is using a hearing to denigrate the vaccine injury. 3:01:24 Oh, no, I mean, these vaccines, the COVID injection, this saved 3.2 million lives. 3:01:29 What are you talking about, Senator Johnson? 3:01:31 No, it didn't. 3:01:34 So now extrapolate this to all the other studies. 3:01:40 I don't know what the truth is. 3:01:41 I know that's a lie. 3:01:44 There's no way that this Commonwealth Fund study is accurate. 3:01:50 It's rubbish. 3:01:51 But it's the experts. 3:01:54 Just like the experts that told us to wear masks, six feet distancing, vaccinate your six-month-old child. 3:02:05 We've got to stop listening to experts. Speaker 2
3:02:10 Senator Johnson, can I just on that point, because when I was preparing for the Trusted News Initiative, I had a list of questions as to whether or not they got anything new. 3:02:23 And just again, so Trusted News Initiative is just, you know, BBC formed a group to basically vet misinformation. 3:02:32 It was originally for election information, I think because of the U.S. presidential campaigns. 3:02:39 But then they started using it for COVID. 3:02:44 Did anyone get anything right here? 3:02:46 Because did they lie to us about masking? 3:02:51 Yes. 3:02:51 Like, absolutely. 3:02:52 Right. 3:02:52 Like the masking did not save lives. 3:02:56 It wasn't necessary. 3:02:59 Am I right about that? Speaker 5
3:03:00 Yeah, I mean, actually, Michael Eden's got a list of 13 lies told during COVID. 3:03:06 You ought to get that for your record. 3:03:08 That's one of them. Speaker 2
3:03:09 I mean, everyone in this room wore a mask at one point or another because of that. 3:03:15 And we know now that they just made it up, right, because of things like the Fauci diaries and other things? Speaker 5
3:03:20 Well, again, the pores in the mask are larger than the coronavirus itself. 3:03:25 So it stopped nothing. Speaker 2
3:03:27 Yeah, look, the best analogy I saw was is wearing a mask to stop a coronavirus would be like using a chain link fence to stop mosquitoes. 3:03:36 It would be just as effective. 3:03:38 But the thing is, is we know now that even they knew it was a lie, right? 3:03:42 And same with social distancing. 3:03:44 Didn't they just make that up? 3:03:46 Yes. 3:03:47 Like, so, you know, we still in some places have plexiglass and all of that. 3:03:51 And you still see, you know, the footprints on the floor. 3:03:53 That was all just theater, wasn't it? Speaker 5
3:03:56 Yes, they lied. 3:03:57 They lied about the shot staying in your arm. 3:04:00 They lied about the messenger RNA degrading. 3:04:04 They lied about that it was safe and effective because they knew it wasn't. 3:04:08 I've got proof they knew it wasn't, but they lied. Speaker 2
3:04:10 Well, even the effective, I mean, Janine Small, you were kind of referring to her. 3:04:16 She was the Pfizer VP that testified in front of the European Parliament. 3:04:22 So 3:04:23 I think people in Canada believed that the vaccine, because vaccine, we're trained to think it was the old Merriam-Webster definition that would confer immunity. 3:04:35 But with this one, they knew it wouldn't confer immunity. 3:04:38 But at least I think we thought, well, it would stop you from transmitting the virus, which is why you'd give it to kids to protect grandma, which is backwards. 3:04:48 But can you tell us what Janine's 3:04:51 small test fight about, because I think it will shock people. 3:04:54 The main vaccine that was administered in Canada was Pfizer. 3:04:58 And I think it would shock people that they weren't even testing to see if it would stop you spreading it to other people, which kind of begs the question, then why did we take it at all? Speaker 5
3:05:08 So in October of 2020, 3:05:11 Janine Small, who was Pfizer's president of international developed markets, admitted to the EU parliament Pfizer had not tested whether the vaccine prevented transmission. 3:05:22 Didn't test it. 3:05:23 A month later, the former head of Pfizer's research and development department, Katherine Janssen, in a November 2022 interview with Nature, said we flew the plane while we were still building it. 3:05:36 But claimed it's safe and effective. 3:05:38 By the way, the studies that were not conducted, this I got from testimony from one of our hearings. 3:05:43 It might have been from Toby Roth. 3:05:46 This is a list of omitted studies that should shock everyone. 3:05:51 They never tested drug-drug interactions. 3:05:54 They never tested for cardiovascular toxicity. 3:05:57 They never tested for central nervous system toxicity, other organ toxicity, blood toxicity, genotoxicity, carcinogenicity. 3:06:09 I don't think they've tested to this day because that's the whole game. 3:06:12 Whether it's a childhood vaccine or whether it's this experimental gene therapy, get it approved. 3:06:19 And because it's a vaccine, in America, you have no liability. 3:06:24 You're completely protected. 3:06:26 And so there's no incentive for either the drug manufacturer, the vaccine manufacturer, or the government officials that approved it to do the long-term safety studies to disprove that they shouldn't have approved it. 3:06:43 So there's every incentive to hide it. 3:06:49 There's every incentive to not be honest with the regulators when you go for the approval. 3:06:54 which is why, again, I don't have the exact dates, but the deaths that were in the placebo arm were reported very rapidly. 3:07:01 But the deaths in the vaccine arm of the study, they delayed reporting those things to the point where some of them weren't even reported by the time it got the emergency use authorization. 3:07:12 So again, as I said in the hall, in my investigation, we are finding pieces of the puzzle. 3:07:20 But it's like a thousand-piece puzzle and we maybe got 3:07:23 30 of the pieces. 3:07:26 We got a long way to go. Speaker 2
3:07:27 In Canada, we did it a little differently. 3:07:31 We didn't have emergency use. 3:07:33 So the minister felt issued an interim order exempting all COVID drugs. 3:07:40 So that would include remdesivir as well as the COVID-19 vaccines. 3:07:44 So all COVID-19 drugs were exempted from the regular drug process where you have to prove safety and efficacy. 3:07:52 Now, the interesting thing is, is the interim order exempted them from having to go through the regular process, but they could have still chosen to go through the regular process. 3:08:02 But no, they go through the sub-urgency process. 3:08:05 Do you know, Senator Johnson, under our process, you didn't even have to submit the safety data prior to approval. 3:08:13 And then, even then, it was only the known safety data. 3:08:16 You just have to say, well, to get approval, well, we'll get it to you, you know, by this time. 3:08:23 Because our test didn't even include the word safety or the word efficacy, our test was something like the Minister of Health has sufficient evidence to support the conclusion, so now we're in a subjective test, that the benefits of the drug outweigh the risks having regard to the uncertainties concerning the benefits and risks and the urgent public health emergency presented by COVID-19. 3:08:48 We've permanently to this day exempted the COVID-19 drugs from having to go through the regular process of proving safety and efficacy. 3:08:56 Is that similar to the United States? 3:08:59 Is that what you're saying is they haven't had to really go through the regular process even to this day, even though COVID isn't an emergency? Speaker 5
3:09:07 Yeah, that's what Operation Warp Speed made possible is they're able to circumvent all these studies that normally... 3:09:13 Anthony Fauci, I think that Milken Institute that we've talked about in the past, he's saying it's going to take, you know, 10 years to really develop and prove these things. 3:09:21 We did it in a number of months. 3:09:23 So, you know, unfortunately, Canada, other countries, they believed and they relied on the FDA and CDC and NIH in America. 3:09:32 Just like doctors, just like hospitals, that kind of stuff. 3:09:34 They listened to and followed the directions of people that they shouldn't have done. 3:09:38 But you mentioned remdesivir again. 3:09:40 Let me just quick. 3:09:41 point out the hypocrisy of Fauci when it comes to remdesivir. 3:09:45 This is an email sent on March 18th, 2020. 3:09:51 This is 18 days after Peter Marks already found out that we got a problem with the algorithm, but on a different issue. 3:10:00 He's writing to Robert Redfield, then the director of the CDC. 3:10:05 He's comparing remdesivir to hydroxychloroquine. 3:10:07 He says, we need to link remdesivir 3:10:10 to a much more strict protocol, as opposed to hydroxychloroquine, which is an approved drug, and although it does have some adverse events, we have tons of experience with it. 3:10:24 They have the Surgisphere study, which was completely fraudulent, which they published here. 3:10:28 It tanked hydroxychloroquine, together with what Rick Bright did for it. 3:10:35 But here, Fauci is saying, we've got a lot of experience with hydroxychloroquine. 3:10:40 but we really need to be a little more careful with remdesivir. 3:10:43 All of a sudden, remdesivir just became the drug to use, right? 3:10:48 It was manufactured by Gilead, made a lot of money for Gilead. 3:10:55 In an interview of Cheryl Atkinson, Full Measure, she's talking to Dr. Jane Orient and also Stephen Hadfill, and Cheryl says it turns out one author of the report, so they did a study on remdesivir, 3:11:09 And in the middle of the study, they changed the endpoint from death, because it had no impact on death, to days to recovery, which apparently, for whatever reason, whether the data is true or not, remdesivir showed less days to recovery. 3:11:23 It turns out one of the authors of the report issued by HHS received research funding from Gilead, the maker of remdesivir, including a $247,000 grant. 3:11:35 She goes on, we checked financial ties among experts on the government panel devising coronavirus treatment guidelines. 3:11:43 We found 11 members reporting links to a drug company, nine of them named relationships to Remdesivir's maker Gilead. 3:11:50 Seven more, including two of the committee's leaders, have ties to Gilead beyond the 11 months they chose to disclose. 3:11:56 So, gee, you think there's a conflict of interest in all of a sudden rushing Remdesivir to get emergency use authorization? 3:12:02 even though who recommend against the use of it. 3:12:05 They stopped using it in Ebola trial because it killed the subjects faster than the protocol without remdesivir. 3:12:12 Now, I'll close up on my remdesivir rant. 3:12:15 One of the witnesses for our hospital protocols, he's a staff surgeon at Providence Regional Medical Center in Everett, Washington. 3:12:23 And he's one of the courageous doctors that came to help out during COVID. 3:12:29 And he said, after our hospital was given remdesivir by CDC, we were provided misleading, inaccurate information about the drug by medical leadership. 3:12:38 When I had a young trauma patient who was a perfect candidate, according to their protocols, for remdesivir, the infectious disease doctor on call told me to not give it to her because, quote, she seems like a nice girl. 3:12:53 He concludes it was known early that remdesivir kills. 3:12:58 That was the standard of care. Speaker 2
3:13:02 How do you think the doctors are dealing with this? 3:13:05 Because they have to know. Speaker 5
3:13:06 I mean, I hope and pray that they're searching their consciences. 3:13:13 Again, when you saw the doctors that they made an example of, I have just sympathy for doctors who didn't want to give up all their training, all their career. 3:13:26 They want to continue to be doctors. 3:13:27 So I get that. 3:13:29 But I hope in light of what's being revealed right now, I hope there's an awful lot of soul-searching occurring within the medical establishment. 3:13:37 Not only doctors and nurses, but hospital administrators within these federal health agencies. 3:13:45 Again, that's why I'm not stopping. 3:13:47 We need to expose the truth. 3:13:49 And it's going to be difficult. 3:13:50 Again, we're not going to get the 1,000 pieces of that puzzle. 3:13:54 Maybe we get 100. 3:13:55 But even with the 30 pieces we've got... 3:13:59 We have some pretty incriminating and revealing evidence of what happened. 3:14:03 You don't have to be a soothsayer to kind of connect the dots and go, okay, I see what was happening here. 3:14:12 But you have to be open to it. 3:14:13 You have to open up your eyes. 3:14:16 And then once you see it, don't close them. 3:14:19 What's the saying? 3:14:20 Fool me once, shame on you. 3:14:23 Fool me twice, three, four, five, six, seven, eight. 3:14:27 Lie to me twice. 3:14:29 I mean, they lied to us. 3:14:32 Plain and simple, they lied to us, bald face, repeatedly, scandalously. 3:14:41 And of course, if there is one of the, I mean, in addition to the injection injured and the deaths, if there's one casualty of COVID and what we did, it's just the, we don't trust doctors and nurses. 3:14:56 We don't trust the medical establishment anymore. 3:14:59 I mean, there's a growing percentage, certainly of Americans, will not go to the hospital. 3:15:05 I think one of the things we talked about last night was the Rasmussen poll. 3:15:11 The initial poll was 24, what was it? 3:15:17 I got it here. 3:15:20 Well, off the top of my head. 3:15:22 25% of Americans believe they personally knew somebody who died from the COVID injection. 3:15:29 And under 50% thought it probably led to a significant number of deaths. 3:15:34 The most recent poll, 24% of Americans still believe they know, personally know somebody who died from the COVID injection, and 53% believe it probably caused a significant number of deaths. 3:15:44 Now, again, that's not a study. 3:15:46 It's not a random, you know, this isn't, this is just people's experience. 3:15:51 This is what they saw. 3:15:52 They know people that went in the hospital. 3:15:56 who begged for, I mean, just give it a shot. 3:15:58 I'm dying. 3:15:59 Just would you give these safe, cheap, just give it a shot? 3:16:02 No, not going to do that. 3:16:05 Can you imagine how gut-wrenching and frustrating that was for family members who say, oh, dad's unvaccinated. 3:16:12 He's going to die. 3:16:13 Would you at least give him ivermectin? 3:16:14 Nope, won't do that either. 3:16:18 I mean, one of the testimonies is they would not give their father or their loved one last rites unless they agreed that that loved one would get a dose of remdesivir first. 3:16:28 Now, that's craven. 3:16:31 That's craven to the point of evil. 3:16:33 Okay? 3:16:34 It's a testimony. 3:16:36 I can't verify it, but that's what people, and enough Americans, I think enough people worldwide saw that, and they believed it. 3:16:46 And they're not going to believe these experts anymore. 3:16:49 And that's, you know, we actually, it would be nice to have federal health agencies. 3:16:53 It would be nice to have a world health agency. 3:16:55 So you could trust. 3:16:58 These people had integrity. 3:16:59 They were putting the interests of the public first, not the interests of the drug companies that have captured them. 3:17:07 that influence them, or the Bill Gates of the world that sprinkle his foundation money around and then cash in as the stock price of vaccine manufacturers goes up. Speaker 1
3:17:20 Again, there's no winners here. Speaker 5
3:17:23 Well, there were winners. 3:17:24 The billionaire. 3:17:24 I mean, there were winners, okay? 3:17:27 But for the vast majority of us, it was just a loss-loss. 3:17:31 It was a tragic one at that. Speaker 6
3:17:34 I can just ask a question very quickly. 3:17:36 Just to build off what you were saying there, Senator, I'm just going to go back to the doctors and the nurses for a moment because you brought something to my attention that I had forgotten. 3:17:45 Shame on me. 3:17:47 I don't believe that sentiment is the same in Canada. 3:17:50 I personally don't believe that we don't trust our health care system. 3:17:54 Could it be a heck of a lot better with the service side of things? 3:18:00 Believe, truthfully believe that we trust our doctors and our nurses. 3:18:05 But that leads me to my question for you, because I know during COVID, I know it because I've met with a lot of amazing nurses that refused to get the shot that had an ultimatum. 3:18:18 You get the shot or you lose your job. 3:18:22 Now, ironically, two years later, they said, would you please come back? 3:18:25 You don't need to get the shot. 3:18:26 Please, please, please come back because we are screaming for nurses. 3:18:30 They were screaming for nurses during COVID as well. 3:18:34 But so many of those amazing individuals that literally gave their whole life to serving everyone else were thrown out with the trash, thrown out with the baby water, and thrown to the wolves, which was disgusting. 3:18:47 And it wasn't just nurses. 3:18:48 It was surgeons as well, right in my own backyard. 3:18:52 My question is, did the same thing happen in the United States in that, or was it state to state? Speaker 5
3:18:57 Oh, no, no, the exact same thing happened. 3:19:00 It is. 3:19:01 You know, yeah, there was a huge nursing shortage, partly because they literally terminated nurses who wouldn't get the shot. 3:19:09 There was one testimony I saw. 3:19:11 This is quite a few years ago, so this is a paraphrase. 3:19:16 But there were, this is a nurse reporting, nursing professors. 3:19:22 And they're sitting around because they required all their nursing students to get vaccinated. 3:19:26 And some of them didn't. 3:19:28 And they were literally laughing. 3:19:33 You know, those... Yeah. 3:19:37 Throw three years of nursing school out the window. 3:19:40 They're laughing at them. 3:19:44 They're finding pleasure in the fact that those young women or young men who wanted to be nurses and, again, be the primary caregivers. 3:19:56 They're... 3:19:57 The same thing in the military. 3:19:58 I think 8,500 members of the U.S. military were discharged. 3:20:03 Some of them are coming back. Speaker 1
3:20:05 By the way, that continues to be a huge cover-up in the U.S. military. Speaker 5
3:20:11 We had testimony of the DMED system showing dramatic increases in all these diagnoses. 3:20:16 And when we wrote to the Defense Department, they go, oh, we had a glitch in our data. 3:20:21 We said, preserve that data. 3:20:22 They didn't. 3:20:24 Took the system down, brought it back up. 3:20:26 Oh, nothing to see here anymore. 3:20:29 We've had Dr. Teresa Long testify. 3:20:31 She's now on the case trying to get the information. 3:20:34 But again, I have to emphasize, so much of the evidence has already been destroyed, was never created because they're smart enough not to put incriminating things in writing. 3:20:46 But what's actually pretty amazing is how much we have uncovered. 3:20:50 And I think how much is probably left to be uncovered. 3:20:52 Now, if we get these devices, it's kind of hard to be operating every day of the, you know, looking over your shoulder and making sure you don't put this thing in writing, right? 3:21:03 We're not all angels. 3:21:05 But no, it's tragically the exact same thing happened. 3:21:08 I just have nothing but respect for those doctors and nurses who just refused it. 3:21:13 And they paid an enormous price that was not fair. Speaker 2
3:21:25 When you were talking earlier about how the flu vaccine is now approved and mRNA flu vaccine, and I think you said it was like 2.7% risk of a serious adverse event, including, you know, death or, you know, imminent death and serious disablement. 3:21:46 You know, parents, even hearing that, might not think that that's a big risk, even though it's a huge risk. 3:21:53 And I thought, you know, if you had 100 parents and their kids in a room and they all had to get vaccinated together and they were truthful and said, okay, only 97 kids are going to come out of this room. 3:22:03 You're going to lose three to protect the 100 from the flu. 3:22:07 And the parents know their kid's not going to die of the flu. 3:22:10 It would probably stop that type of thing. 3:22:14 Why do you think it is that, and I do appreciate because of COVID, the vaccination rate has dropped, but why do you think... 3:22:22 Parents are so trusting of public health. Speaker 5
3:22:27 Because I think public health officials mislead them. 3:22:31 You know, for one of our hearings, I've had my staff print out the effectiveness. 3:22:37 And this is reported by CDC, the effectiveness of the flu shot over many, many years. 3:22:44 One year is as low as 10%. 3:22:46 Now, I think to get approval of a vaccine, it has to be shown at least 50% effective. 3:22:51 Again, that's taking it from 0.1 down to 0.95. 3:23:02 And yet you're subjecting yourself to potentially almost 3% risk of a serious adverse event. 3:23:09 It just doesn't compute. 3:23:10 But that's what I said. 3:23:12 I didn't answer one of the questions. 3:23:12 I mean, 3:23:14 familiarize yourself with absolute versus relative risk, you know, what that means, and know what the published risk of these things are versus what your risk is of getting that disease. 3:23:27 I mean, nobody wants to get the flu or a cold. 3:23:30 We've never developed a vaccine for the cold or really even a cure. 3:23:34 You know, 3:23:36 You keep your immune system firing on all cylinders. 3:23:39 By the way, one of my knocks on Fauci, he started taking megadoses of vitamin D. And like the Grinch who solved hunger told no one, he told no one. 3:23:50 And Fauci knew enough, you know, do something to boost your immune system. Speaker 2
3:23:52 Well, that's things like vitamin D. It seems that you made a comment earlier that some of – 3:24:03 there was a difference between Democrat run states and Republican run states. 3:24:10 And in Canada too, there seems to be some polarization on this issue between parties. 3:24:15 How do you think we can get through this? 3:24:17 Because it seems to me that anything health or, you know, the issue of vaccine hesitancy or lack of confidence in public health, that's a problem that needs to be solved. 3:24:28 Like surely it's good for a nation if, 3:24:31 the populace has confidence in their public health authorities. 3:24:34 How do you think we can move through that and get through, you know, party differences and make this about what's best for the citizen again? Speaker 5
3:24:43 So as much as I ran because we're mortgaging our kids' future, for the last few years, and, you know, we've had Admiral Mike Mullen saying the greatest threat to America is our debt and deficit. 3:24:54 I mean, for a number of years now, I've said, no, I think the greatest threat to America and our democracy is our 3:25:00 Horribly divided country. 3:25:04 It's just unsustainable. 3:25:06 And the only cure I can see for that is kind of what you do in the business world. 3:25:10 You know, you don't get very far in business arguing all the time. 3:25:14 Business, you try and find areas of agreement. 3:25:16 I got a product. 3:25:16 You want to buy it? 3:25:17 Okay, now we'll hang over the price. 3:25:20 So I think it's about focusing on areas of agreement. 3:25:25 But one of the problems we have today is what's true? 3:25:32 I mean, I certainly have a bias. 3:25:35 I'll see something posted on social media and go, unbelievable. 3:25:40 Generally, I try and vet all of it. 3:25:41 I've got a pretty good staff. 3:25:44 Don't believe that. 3:25:46 It seems entirely true. 3:25:48 Not everybody's got a staff to vet the latest outrage on both sides. 3:25:54 So I hate to say this, I have a trust in News Initiative. 3:26:00 I understand the desire to 3:26:02 to have some referee out there saying, this is true, this isn't, it's just not going to be possible. 3:26:10 So, you know, I think it was Louis Brandeis, some impact, you know, when talking about misinformation and, you know, particularly misinformation that could be harmful to public health. 3:26:21 So the solution isn't less speech. 3:26:27 The solution is more speech. 3:26:28 That's a paraphrase and probably a pretty bad one at that. 3:26:30 But I mean, 3:26:32 The solution literally is more speech. 3:26:36 And as consumers of speech, as consumers of information, we need to be very discerning. 3:26:43 I've become far more wary of allowing my biases to automatically agree with something that I think is kind of a blockbuster revelation that reinforces what I believe. 3:26:54 And to vet that out, I think as consumers of information, we just need to be more wary of that. 3:27:00 I mean, now with AI, these deep fakes, I mean, I can't tell you how many videos I sent my siblings, which is great videos of, you know, a lion saving a lamb. 3:27:10 It's fake, you know. 3:27:12 I've been very disappointed sometimes of the ones I've said, ah, rats, another AI fake. 3:27:18 So again, that's just a problem. 3:27:20 But 3:27:22 Focus on areas of agreement. 3:27:23 That's what I said, you know, I opened up, you know, I love Canada. 3:27:25 I love Canadians. 3:27:26 I mean, understand that shared heritage. 3:27:28 Focus on that. 3:27:29 Yeah. 3:27:29 Okay. 3:27:30 I know we got disagreements. 3:27:34 Okay. 3:27:35 Those are real. 3:27:36 Okay. 3:27:36 They're not going away. 3:27:38 But I think what binds us together is human beings. 3:27:42 And we see it all the time. 3:27:44 We're coming up on the 25th anniversary of 9-11, which I'm sure was every bit as impactful in Canada as it was in America. 3:27:53 We see moments of tragedy like that. 3:27:57 The absolute best come out of people as human beings. 3:28:00 You know, the firefighters walking into danger lost their lives. 3:28:08 So, I mean, focus on good. 3:28:09 I know I'm here doom and gloom, and I've got a lot of criticism and that kind of stuff, but... 3:28:18 You've got to believe good is going to overcome it. 3:28:20 You've got to believe truth will prevail, which is why this, again, this inquiry is so important. 3:28:28 And, again, everything said here may not be true. 3:28:31 Some of the witnesses, we might get some things wrong. 3:28:36 Don't slaughter us over it. 3:28:39 Don't vilify. 3:28:39 I mean, we're trying to tell the truth. 3:28:41 Prove me wrong, I'll apologize and correct it right off the bat. 3:28:46 Again, bring that level of humility and modesty to these discussions. 3:28:52 Doctors. 3:28:55 You can't expect doctors to know all these things. 3:28:59 It's impossible. 3:29:01 They specialize in an area. 3:29:03 That's why doctors consult. 3:29:04 It's like, I don't know much about kidneys. 3:29:07 I mean, take a look at these. 3:29:08 So have people some slack. 3:29:12 But at the same time, doctors need to be 3:29:15 But one thing I've seen is there's a God complex to doctors, and by the way, it's necessary. 3:29:22 If you're making life and death decisions, you better have that level of confidence and be willing to forgive yourself when you make the wrong decision. 3:29:31 It's going to happen. 3:29:32 It's called medical practice. 3:29:35 But within that reality, have a little more modesty, a little more humility. 3:29:40 When you get somebody that, you know, somebody's calling a crackpot because they're using this horse paste, 3:29:46 Open up your mind to it. 3:29:48 I mean, this, you know, Pierre Croy, this Paul Merrick, these guys are smart people. 3:29:53 You know, one testimony, and I think this is my COVID-19 second opinion, came from Paul Merrick, who's just an eminently qualified, world-renowned critical care specialist. 3:30:04 And because of hospital protocols, they literally took away the tools he was using. 3:30:09 He was using high-dose, you know, vitamin C, which, by the way, he's kind of shown cure sepsis and still not, 3:30:16 being readily accepted, but ivermectin. 3:30:18 They took away all of his tools. 3:30:22 And he had like seven, I think he had seven patients in critical care in the ICU that he believed he could treat successfully. 3:30:29 He said, but they took away my tools. 3:30:31 They tied my hands behind my back. 3:30:36 And all I could do is sit by and watch my patients die. 3:30:45 Again, that's powerful testimony, and hospital administrators and other doctors need to look at that and search their souls. 3:30:56 Yeah, you have to be confident, but you also have to be modest and humble. 3:31:01 As you approach life and death decisions, as you approach the complexity of the human body, I mean, our immune system is a marvel system. 3:31:12 How could they kick it to the curb and say, ah, can't rely on that? 3:31:16 Rely on our experimental gene therapy. 3:31:20 Again, it's absurd, isn't it? 3:31:25 It's absurd. 3:31:28 But we live that absurdity. 3:31:30 And to a certain extent, we still are. 3:31:33 But again, the solution, focus on the areas of agreement, aggressively pursue the truth. Speaker 3
3:31:43 And when you're wrong, admit it. Speaker 2
3:31:56 We're getting close to the end of the time that we have slotted for you. 3:32:02 When COVID was running, my wife and I, we were glued to the TV, the news, and there's all these cases, cases, cases, 3:32:12 like you'd think that they were, you know, they imported a bunch of people for all these cases. 3:32:19 Can you tell us why that was a problem? 3:32:24 Why the use of these PCR tests in cases were a problem and were misleading to the public? Speaker 5
3:32:32 So the inventor of the PCR test didn't live to the pandemic. 3:32:36 I think he died in 2019. 3:32:38 His name was Dr. Kerry Mullis. 3:32:41 And his famous quote is about the PCR said, it doesn't tell you that you're sick. 3:32:47 That the thing you've ended up with was really going to hurt you. 3:32:52 But that's exactly what the scaremongers and fearmongers use it for. 3:32:58 So the PCR test, again, I'm. 3:33:02 You'd have better people equipped to tell you this. 3:33:03 But, I mean, it goes through cycles. 3:33:05 And it's identifying molecular material. 3:33:08 And the more times you cycle it, the more chances you're going to find a piece of that coronavirus, a molecule that matches that. 3:33:15 And, well, you got COVID when you don't. 3:33:20 You know, it was just misused. 3:33:24 And, you know, I remember, actually, when I told that story about Francis Collins and I was pointing out VAERS, it was a group of Republican senators who 3:33:32 in April of 2021, and they're all patting themselves on the back about, yeah, we got that testing. 3:33:38 The testing was one of their mix-ups, okay, because we just didn't have rapid tests so we could scare the crap out of the American public or the global public about how many people were catching this thing. 3:33:51 But they finally had it perfected by April of 2021. 3:33:54 I was the skunk in the room after they were patting themselves on the back about, hey, we got that test, you know. 3:34:00 I'm the one that asked, well, what about VAERS? 3:34:02 What are you looking at there? 3:34:05 So, no, I mean, I think we completely misused testing. 3:34:09 But again, we misused it to... We knew from Johnny Unitas. 3:34:17 We knew from Oxford's Center for Evidence-Based Medicine. 3:34:20 We knew from Anthony Fauci's diary. 3:34:25 Not to dismiss COVID, but, you know, a bad flu season. Speaker 3
3:34:29 We knew it. 3:34:31 They knew it. Speaker 5
3:34:35 And they did this to us. 3:34:38 Maybe, again, that's why I say of all the revelations of Fauci's diary, it's that. 3:34:43 He was confiding in his diary that he knew, he confirmed basically what John Ioannidis and what Oxford Center for Evidence-Based Medicine, you know, basically confirming what I said. 3:34:55 Lose 39,000 people, we don't shut down the highway. 3:34:58 We can't shut down the economy. 3:35:00 Not for a bad flu season. 3:35:01 We'll get through it. 3:35:03 Help doctors. 3:35:04 Help hospitals. 3:35:06 A bad flu season overwhelms hospitals. 3:35:08 I don't know about Canada, but I really never talked to a hospital in Wisconsin that was overwhelmed. 3:35:14 I talked to doctors. 3:35:18 Now, there were hospitals in New York. 3:35:20 I think Louisiana, Italy, China. 3:35:23 I mean, there were. 3:35:25 But I think this was way overhyped. 3:35:30 I just do. Speaker 2
3:35:33 If you can talk about COVID deaths and whether you think the numbers were inflated. 3:35:39 I'll just share a personal story. 3:35:43 My mother-in-law was in a care home, but really healthy, not sick of anything. 3:35:51 She had done wheelchair bowling the day before. 3:35:55 Nobody's saying that she's got COVID or sick or needs to be isolated. 3:36:00 And we don't know what happened in the night. 3:36:02 We suspect a really severe stroke, but in the morning she was basically brain dead and dying. 3:36:08 So we were just told, go to the hospital. 3:36:10 She's taken to the hospital and the hospital says, we're not doing anything. 3:36:14 Like we can't save her. 3:36:15 She's dying today. 3:36:16 So we're just waiting for, it wasn't until 10 at night that she died. 3:36:22 So they're not going to treat her for anything. 3:36:26 But I bet you we turned them away at least 25 times they wanted to test her for COVID. 3:36:32 And I knew, at least I suspected, that the reason they wanted to test her for COVID is because if she tested positive for COVID, they would treat her as a COVID death because they were treating in Canada, and my question is the same thing happened in the U.S., they're treating any death where you died with COVID as a death 3:36:55 Of COVID. 3:36:56 And, you know, I'm at the age where, you know, my age and up, almost every man has prostate cancer. 3:37:04 But we never know and it never kills us. 3:37:07 But if they recorded every death of my age and up male as prostate cancer, then we'd have this big epidemic. 3:37:16 But that would be meaningless fear because it didn't kill us and it wasn't going to kill us. 3:37:23 We just had it. 3:37:25 So is that the type of thing that happened in the States? 3:37:28 Because both my wife and I were severely troubled by this relentless request to test her for COVID when everyone knows she's not dying of COVID and you're not even treating her. 3:37:40 So why even test? 3:37:42 There's not going to be any intervention. 3:37:44 We're waiting for her to die. Speaker 5
3:37:46 So there's all kinds of anecdotal evidence of people in a basically failed car crash and tested positive for COVID. 3:37:53 He died of COVID. 3:37:54 So I think that was rampant. 3:37:55 I think that happened, but we don't know. 3:37:58 They don't want to know. 3:38:00 They got the result they wanted. 3:38:02 They were able to juice the numbers, create the fear so they could get the result they wanted, which was the mRNA injection. 3:38:08 And 3:38:10 I've tried it. 3:38:11 It's kind of hard because I've looked into kind of the finances of this, what research has been done in America primarily because we just opened up the speakers and just threw money at the problem, right? 3:38:23 Literally trillions of dollars. 3:38:25 And the studies have been done on this is that the large profitable hospitals profit even more and rural hospitals kind of took a beating during COVID. 3:38:36 I think just in general, hospitals did really well. 3:38:40 They made oodles and oodles of money. 3:38:42 States did well, too. 3:38:43 Sent all kinds of COVID relief to states to still spend the money. 3:38:48 Because there actually were some strings had to be done for COVID. 3:38:50 They couldn't figure out how to do it. 3:38:52 So, no, I think the overstatement of COVID deaths was real. 3:38:56 Just you can't prove it, you know, other than anecdotally. 3:39:00 But I think everybody kind of recognizes that's true. Speaker 1
3:39:11 All right. 3:39:12 Is there any more questions for colleagues at all? 3:39:15 Go ahead, Chris. Speaker 6
3:39:16 I just wanted to say thank you once again. 3:39:18 One final time, Senator, we really, really appreciate you being here. 3:39:23 As I mentioned to you in the hallway as well, your opening remarks about loving Canada and understanding that we're not the enemy and equally the United States isn't the enemy either. 3:39:34 Yes, there's a lot of politics being played, but 3:39:37 The very fact that you said that in opening the public, that helps resolve the problems. 3:39:42 And the only other thing I'd ask, Senator, is can you please tell those Vikings to stay away from my Lions because we need a win in Detroit. Speaker 5
3:39:49 Well, your Lions, my condolences. 3:39:52 I had a neighbor that was a Lions fan. 3:39:53 It's like that's a tough road to hoe. Speaker 2
3:39:59 And Teresa walked up to me and said, ask him, what's next? Speaker 5
3:40:04 What's next? 3:40:05 What's next? 3:40:08 So as I said, we've only now gotten documents. 3:40:11 This was after six years of investigation. 3:40:14 Now we're finally getting documents. 3:40:16 So we have evidence, which is what you need before you call people in for transcribed interviews. 3:40:22 Otherwise, they run circles around you. 3:40:23 I mean, even with evidence, as I was saying, we've interviewed some of the people in CDC. 3:40:27 They're completely unrepentant. 3:40:29 You can't phase them. 3:40:30 There's nothing you can show them that said, yeah, you probably ought to consider this one as a safety signal. 3:40:35 We weren't seeing safety signals. 3:40:36 What can I say? 3:40:38 So we'll continue to gather that evidence. 3:40:41 Again, we've got more devices that they are supposed to have in their possession, but, again, it drives you nuts. 3:40:49 They can't answer simple questions. 3:40:51 Okay, you say you possess this, but it's been decommissioned and out of inventory. 3:40:55 What does that mean? 3:40:56 We can't tell you what it means. 3:41:00 Again, I cannot tell you. 3:41:02 I always say nobody can out-frustrate me. 3:41:04 But we will continue. 3:41:05 I will be dogged as long as, particularly as I'm chairman, I'll need to remain chairman in order to have the subpoena authority to at least threaten subpoenas to compel these agencies, even under Bobby Kennedy. 3:41:16 I mean, we need that authority. 3:41:19 But certainly if we maintain the majority of the next two years, get more documentation, we're starting to call people in for interviews. 3:41:28 And one of the reasons we don't just do a document dump, you know, like here's the stuff, here's what we found out. 3:41:34 In order to investigate integrity, when you call witnesses in, they can't know what you have. 3:41:42 They have to suspect that you know everything they wrote. 3:41:49 So that when you ask them a question, they better answer it honestly because in some cases we know the answer to the question. 3:41:55 Some cases we don't, but we want them to be under as much pressure to answer truthfully. 3:42:00 So, again, the interview phase of my investigation has only begun. 3:42:04 I hope it will be quite revealing. 3:42:07 We're getting more whistleblowers coming up saying, well, you should have this document. 3:42:11 We don't. 3:42:14 We do know, for example, I'll name him, Tom Shimbukuro, who was the chief safety surveillance official at 3:42:22 in CDC. 3:42:24 He was touting VAERS in October, all that type of thing. 3:42:30 With the permission of the Office of General Counsel of HHS, he deleted emails. 3:42:37 Now, I think HHS was tried by a court, so he can't do that. 3:42:40 I mean, that's a violation of the Federal Records Act. 3:42:42 But again, he's covered by the fact that 3:42:46 He was based on an Office of General Counsel opinion that, yeah, you're not high enough for the food chain. 3:42:51 You can delete what you want to delete. 3:42:56 What we've also found out, though, is that not only were they deleted on the device, but they appear to have been deleted on the server. 3:43:06 I know how to delete an email. 3:43:07 I have no idea how I delete those. 3:43:11 Because, again, electronic communications, it doesn't disappear. 3:43:15 Those things are pretty much forever. 3:43:17 unless somebody knows what they're doing, deletes them. 3:43:20 So we'll see where this goes. 3:43:22 I can see my investigation expanding into, because we already have Dr. David Morins, right? 3:43:31 He wrote the famous email, we've got this FOIA lady, show me how to make emails disappear. 3:43:35 You know, other emails, my staff's uncovered. 3:43:39 He's now, again, he confessed to a conspiracy to violate the Federal Records Act. 3:43:45 So I'm hoping he turns state evidence on fellow conspirators. 3:43:50 But we've seen that time and time and time again, those type of emails like, well, let's talk about this. 3:43:55 Not good for email or send this to my Gmail. 3:43:58 We see that time and time again. 3:43:59 So I can see my investigation expanding into just rampant violations of the Federal Records Act within these agencies. Speaker 1
3:44:15 Well, Senator, we want to wish you all the best. 3:44:17 As I said, we led off this morning. 3:44:20 There's been nothing of this type or kind in Canada. 3:44:24 And you have led the charge in, I would say, most of the world for looking into this. 3:44:30 And we really appreciate your insight, what you've heard, what you've experienced, what witnesses have told you as you try and sift through what is right or what is correct and what isn't. 3:44:41 And I think we had a conversation, previous conversation, we said, you know, as someone that chairs these committees, it's very important that we tell the truth, right? 3:44:50 We have to understand the truth, especially as you're looking through this stuff. 3:44:54 So if we don't know the answer, we can say that. 3:44:57 And we can say we can look for more information. 3:44:59 So we just appreciate your diligence to try and seek the truth. 3:45:04 I think that nothing could be more important in a day and age where people like to obscure the truth, where people don't value the truth. 3:45:12 We want to just encourage you to keep going. 3:45:14 We'll be keeping an eye on it. 3:45:16 And we know how busy you are. 3:45:17 And so thank you for taking time out of your very busy schedule, flying all the way across the country to hang out with us. 3:45:24 And I know you're going back to Washington soon, back to work. 3:45:28 And so we do appreciate your time and spending the whole morning here with us because of how precious your time is. Speaker 5
3:45:34 So there's really no need to thank me because I just truly appreciate the opportunity. 3:45:38 I mean, we talked about this, what I consider is a bombshell report, April 29th, Peter Marks, 3:45:44 was warned the algorithm with high safety signals. 3:45:46 He was shown safety signals. 3:45:47 They're still lying about it. 3:45:49 Now, I've been interviewed on some of the news programs, but not one major network, including Fox News, CBS, NBC, ABC, PBS, not one, not one major newspaper, not the Wall Street Journal, not New York Times, not Washington Post, have covered this bombshell, the greatest government scandal in my lifetime, 3:46:12 of the hiding these safety signals as news, not one. 3:46:16 So I appreciate the opportunity to come here. 3:46:17 I've pretty well gone through my stack of stuff. 3:46:20 I'm sure when I assemble, I'll go, oh, I didn't make that point. 3:46:23 It'll drive me nuts, okay? 3:46:24 But you don't, do not thank me. 3:46:26 I'm thanking you for doing this to open up as many eyes as possible. 3:46:32 And maybe, just maybe, Canadian broadcasters will actually, it's not that hard a report to read. 3:46:39 Both of my reports, you'll learn something. 3:46:42 You ought to be outraged by what you learn. 3:46:44 But again, this was just a great opportunity. 3:46:46 And I'm thanking you for doing this. 3:46:49 And God bless all of you. 3:46:50 And again, God bless the injection injured sitting behind us and the people who are going to testify over the next few days. 3:46:54 I wish you all the luck and Godspeed. Speaker 1
3:46:58 Thank you. 3:47:19 we're going to adjourn now until uh 1 15. 3:47:40 So thank you very much for being here today. 3:47:43 Over the past several years, Canadians experienced the pandemic in very different ways. 3:47:48 Many families lost loved ones to COVID-19. 3:47:52 We had many frontline health care workers and our first responders carried an enormous burden. 3:47:57 And I want to thank all our first responders and our frontline health care workers for all the work that you do every single day. 3:48:03 But there was also Canadians who suffered serious adverse events following vaccination and compassion for those who were injured following the vaccination and a commitment to transparency, accountability and giving people a chance to share their stories and to be heard. 3:48:20 Canadians should never be afraid to tell their stories and government should never be afraid to listen. 3:48:25 Today I want to highlight two reasons why these stories matter and why Canada needs a more thorough examination. Speaker 3
3:48:33 or the experience of Canadians who were injured. Speaker 1
3:48:35 The government recognizes this. 3:48:39 Even the Liberals recognize this. 3:48:41 And federal reporting... ...over 58,000 adverse events reported in Canada... ...is serious. 3:48:52 The federal vaccine injury support program had received... 3:48:58 More than 3,000 of those claims were deemed admissible for review and so the government acknowledged that people have been injured and yet only over 250 people have been compensated. 3:49:10 Those numbers alone tell the story on just how slow and unfair the process has been. 3:49:15 Many individuals tell us they have struggled to be heard, struggled to navigate the system, and struggled to obtain answers. 3:49:22 There are legitimate questions about whether the support program is delivering the assistance efficiently. 3:49:27 According to the report by the Globe and Mail last year, more than $54 million was provided to Oxaero, the company administering the vaccine injury support program, with more than $36 million being spent on administration. 3:49:40 That's two-thirds spent on administration, while only a fraction of the claims have resulted in compensation. 3:49:46 Whether one supports or opposes government pandemic policies, I believe Canadians agree on one principle. 3:49:52 If people have been harmed, they deserve compensation, support, transparency, and a timely assistance. 3:49:57 Second, Canada has increasingly become an outlier among democratic nations when it comes to reviewing what happened during the pandemic. 3:50:04 More than 30 democratic countries have launched significant COVID inquiries, including public commissions, parliamentary investigations, and independent national reviews. 3:50:14 These include countries such as the United Kingdom, Australia, New Zealand, Sweden, Norway, Italy, France, and the United States. 3:50:19 Many G7 countries and many Commonwealth countries have recognized an event of this magnitude deserves careful examination. 3:50:26 These reviews have looked at government decision-making, lockdowns, mandates, policies, vaccine policies, economic impacts, public health preparedness, and civil liberties concerns. 3:50:37 They have not undertaken these inquiries because they all had the answers. 3:50:41 They undertook them 3:50:42 because their citizens deserve answers. 3:50:45 Yet here in Canada, one of the most significant events in modern national history has never been examined through a comprehensive national public inquiry with the level of transparency and independence that many Canadians believe is necessary. 3:50:59 That said... 3:51:00 We're not proposing a national inquiry today. 3:51:03 What we are proposing is something more immediate and accessible, an opportunity for Canadians to share their experiences, tell their stories, and ensure that their voices are heard. 3:51:14 As I've traveled across the country, and as my colleagues have traveled across the country, we have heard countless stories from Canadians. 3:51:22 People have come to my office. 3:51:23 People have written letters. 3:51:24 They've sent emails. Speaker 3
3:51:26 Some lost loved ones.